Educational technology to support patient safety in the operating room: clinical simulation guides
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7085.4369Keywords:
Educational Technology , Patient Safety , Simulation Training , Organizational Culture , Surgical Centers , Perioperative NursingAbstract
Objective: to develop and validate two clinical simulation guides to support and disseminate a culture of safety in the surgical environment. Method: methodological study supported by the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning theoretical framework. The snowball technique was used to validate the clinical guidelines with experts on the subject. Two scales validated for Brazil were used for the pilot test. Results: 89 operating room professionals took part, including 41 doctors, 40 nursing technicians, four nurses, two radiology technicians, and two nursing trainees. Two guides were created, one on conflict management and teamwork in patient safety during the transfer of the patient from the operating room to the post-anesthetic recovery room, and the other dealing with the assistance of the healthcare team in the transfer of care in the post-anesthetic recovery room. The evaluation of Satisfaction with Simulated Clinical Experiences had an average score of 8.3 and Satisfaction and Self-confidence in learning 4.1. Conclusion: the guides have been validated and are suitable for replication in any surgical environment. We believe that this technology could contribute to improving the safety culture in the operating room by providing an opportunity for reflection and critical thinking.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.