Oropharyngeal colostrum immunotherapy and nutrition in preterm newborns: meta-analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003051Palavras-chave:
Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, Infant, Premature, Immunotherapy, Colostrum, Systematic ReviewResumo
OBJECTIVE To investigated the effect of oropharyngeal colostrum immunotherapy in reducing the time required for very low birth weight preterm newborns (VLBW-PTNB: < 1,500g and < 37 weeks) to achieve full enteral nutrition. METHODS Literature search was conducted using four databases, including gray literature, with additional manual search of the references of selected articles. Eligibility criteria consisted of randomized clinical trials, without restriction regarding the date or language of the publication. Two independent reviewers performed the article selection and data extraction. The random-effects meta-analysis used a non-standard technique to assess the mean difference in days to achieve full enteral nutrition, carried out by the Stata 15 statistic program. RESULTS The systematic review comprised 10 studies, and five were selected for meta-analysis, with a population of 764 VLBW-PTNB and gestational age of birth between 25 and 32 weeks. The studies were conducted between 2011 and 2018 in North America, Asia and Africa, with only one conducted in South America. Altogether, they reported the number of days it took 708 VLBW-PTNB to achieve full enteral nutrition, with newborns treated with immunotherapy showing a shorter time in only three studies. Meta-analysis showed a mean difference of -4.26 days, (95% CI -7.44; -1.08d), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 83.1%). CONCLUSION The use of oropharyngeal colostrum immunotherapy can reduce the time for VLBW-PTNB to achieve full nutrition when compared to those who used a placebo or received routine care.
Referências
Ziegler EE. Meeting the nutritional needs of the low-birth-weight infant. Ann Nutr Metab. 2011;58 Suppl 1:8-18. https://doi.org/10.1159/000323381
Oliveira AG, Siqueira PP, Abreu LC. Cuidados nutricionais no recém-nascido de muito baixo peso. Rev Bras Crescimento Desenvolv Hum. 2008;18(2):148-54. https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19876
Garofalo NA, Caplan MS. Oropharyngeal mother’s milk: state of the science and influence on necrotizing enterocolitis. Clin Perinatol. 2019;46(1):77-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2018.09.005
Rodriguez NA, Caplan MS. Oropharyngeal administration of mother’s milk to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis in extremely low-birth-weight infants: theoretical perspectives. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2015;29(1):81-90. https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000087
Margotto PR. Assitência ao recém-nascido de risco. 3. ed. Brasília, DF: Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde; 2013.
Zhang Y, Ji F, Hu X, Cao Y, Latour JM. Oropharyngeal colostrum administration in very low birth weight infants: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(9):869-75. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000001221
Sohn K, Kalanetra KM, Mills DA, Underwood MA. Buccal administration of human colostrum: impact on the oral microbiota of premature infants. J Perinatol. 2016;36(2):106-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.157
Rodriguez NA, Groer MW, Zeller JM, Engstron JL, Fogg L, Du H, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the oropharyngeal administration of mother’s colostrum to extremely low birth weight infants in the first days of life. Neonatal Intens Care. 2011;24(4):31-5.
Abd-Elgawad M, Eldegla H, Khashaba M, Nasef N. Oropharyngeal administration of mother’s milk prior to gavage feeding in preterm infants: a pilot randomized control trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2020;44(1):92-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.1601
Lee J, Kim HS, Jung YH, Choi KY, Shin SH, Kim EK, Choi JH. Oropharyngeal colostrum administration in extremely premature infants: an RCT. Pediatrics. 2015;135(2):e357-66. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-2004
Glass KM, Greecher CP, Doheny KK. Oropharyngeal administration of colostrum increases salivary secretory IgA levels in very low-birth-weight infants. Am J Perinatol. 2017;34(14):1389-95. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603655
Sharma D, Kaur A, Farahbakhsh N, Agarwal S. Role of oropharyngeal administration of colostrum in very-low-birth-weight infants for reducing necrotizing enterocolitis: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Perinatol. 2020;37(7):716-21. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688817
Nasuf AWA, Ojha S, Dorling J. Oropharyngeal colostrum in preventing mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;9(9):CD011921. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011921.pub2
Panchal H, Athalye-Jape G, Patole S. Oropharyngeal colostrum for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Nutr. 2019;10(6):1152-62. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmz033
Garg BD, Balasubramanian H, Kabra NS, Bansal A. Effect of oropharyngeal colostrum therapy in the prevention of necrotising enterocolitis among very low birthweight neonates: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2018;31(5):612-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12585
Tang R, Yao X, Shi L. The effects of colostrum on gastrointestinal function and related diseases in premature infants: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Yangtze Med. 2018;2(4):271-80. https://doi.org/10.4236/ym.2018.24029
Tao J, Mao J, Yang J, Su Y. Effects of oropharyngeal administration of colostrum on the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis, late-onset sepsis, and death in preterm infants: a meta-analysis of RCTs. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020;74:1122-31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-019-0552-4
Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boultron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
Turner RM, Davey J, Clarke MJ, Thompson SG, Higgins JP. Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(3):818-27. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys041
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
Romano-Keeler J, Azcarate-Peril MA, Weitkamp JH, Slaughter JC, McDonald WH, Meng S, et al. Oral colostrum priming shortens hospitalization without changing the immunomicrobial milieu. J Perinatol. 2017;37(1):36-41. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.161
Ferreira DMLM, Oliveira AMM, Leves DV, Bem EB, Fatureto GG, Navarro NF, et al. Randomized controlled trial of oropharyngeal colostrum administration in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019;69(1):126-30. httpw://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002356
Easo S, responsible, et al. Effectiveness of mother’s own colostrum and breast milk as oral immunotherapy and on the feeding behaviors and clinical outcome among preterm infants: a randomized control trial. 2018 [cited 2021 jul 02]. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03633500. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03633500
Jacobi SK, Odle J. Nutritional factors in fluencing intestinal health of the neonate. Adv Nutr. 2012;3(5):687-96. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.112.002683
Cacho NT, Lawrence RM. Innate Immunity and breast milk. Front Immunol. 2017;8:584. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00584
Cong X, Judge M, Xu W, Diallo A, Janton S, Brownell EA, et al. Influence of infant feeding type on gut microbiome development in hospitalized preterm infants. Nurs Res. 2017;66(2):123-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000208
Oddie SJ, Young L, McGuire W. Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;8(8): CD001241. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001241.pub7
Higgins J, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book series. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2008 [cited 2020 jul 01]. Front matter; p. i-xxi. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470712184
Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-13
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:135 . https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T. Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27(6):1785-805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280216669183
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Michelle de Santana Xavier Ramos, Camilla da Cruz Martins, Elivan Silva Souza, Graciete Oliveira Vieira, Isaac Suzart Gomes-Filho, Ana Claudia Morais Godoy Figueiredo, Maurício Gomes Pereira, Simone Seixas da Cruz
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Como Citar
Dados de financiamento
-
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia
Números do Financiamento 4996/2017
