Adequacy of prenatal care and associated factors in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005146Palavras-chave:
Prenatal Care, Health Services Coverage, Maternal Health Services, Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation., Delivery, Obstetric.Resumo
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the degree of adequacy of prenatal care (PNC) in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS) and in its 7 macro-regions considering the time of PNC initiation and the number of appointments attended. It also aims to verify the mode of delivery prevalence and the factors associated with PNC adequacy by mode of delivery. METHODS: Sub analysis from a cross-sectional study conducted among 13,432 childbearing women aged 15–49 years assisted in 66 maternity hospitals of the Unified Health System (SUS) and private associated facilities from September 2017 to October 2019. A standardized form was used to collect sociodemographic data, and information about PNC and delivery from the childbearing women’s prenatal cards, hospital records, and medical reports. RESULTS: The PNC coverage was (98.4%), but only 57.5% of the participants had an adequate PNC defined as the one initiated until the 12th gestational week, with attendance of at least 6 appointments. The cesarean rate was 57.2%. Among women who performed vaginal delivery, multivariate analysis showed that for each 1-year increase in the age of the parturient, the chance of having an adequate PNC increased by 5%. White parturients with higher education and fewer deliveries residing in the macro-region of Valleys were more likely to have an adequate PNC when compared with non-white parturients, who were illiterate and/or had incomplete elementary school, with 3 or more deliveries and who resided in other macro-regions. During pregnancy, 96.0% of the women performed at least one anti-HIV test, 55.8% a rapid test for syphilis, and 75.0% a Venereal Disease Research Laboratory test (VDRL). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the almost universal PNC coverage in RS, the PNC offered by the SUS was adequate for just half of the population, therefore public health policies targeted at women receiving care in this setting shall be revisited.
Referências
World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Atenção pré-natal de baixo risco. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2012.
Gadson A, Akpovi E, Mehta PK. Exploring the social determinants of racial/ethnic disparities in prenatal care utilization and maternal outcome. Semin Perinatol. 2017 Aug;41(5):308-17. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2017.04.008
Vale CCR, Almeida NKDO, Almeida RMVR. Association between prenatal care adequacy indexes and low birth weight outcome. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021 abr;43(4):256-63. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1728779
Rocha NM, Kale PL, Fonseca SC, Brito AS. Neonatal near miss and mortality and associated factors: cohort study of births in the city of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2023;41:e2021302.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2023/41/2021302
Ministério da Saúde (BR). Portaria Nº 1.459, de 24 de junho de 2011. Institui, no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde-SUS-a Rede Cegonha.. Diário Oficial União. 2011.
Ministério da Saúde (BR). DATASUS. SINASC: Sistema de Informações sobre Nascidos Vivos. Nascimentos por residência da mãe por ano do nascimento segundo unidade da Federação. 2017 [cited 2022 Apr 9]. Available from: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?sinasc/cnv/nvuf.def.
Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. HIV/Aids | 2022. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2022. (Boletim Epidemiológico, número especial dez. 2022).
Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Vigilânica em Saúde. Sífilis | 2022. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2022.
Carvalho DS, Novaes HMD. Avaliação da implantação de programa de atenção pré-natal no município de Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil: estudo de coorte em primigestas.Cad. Saúde Pública. Rio de Janeiro, v.20,2004.
Szwarcwald CL, Barbosa Júnior A, Souza-Júnior PRB, Lemos KRV, Frias PG, Luhm KR, et al. HIV testing during pregnancy: use of secondary data to estimate 2006 test coverage and prevalence in Brazil. Brazilian J Infect Dis. 2008 June;12(3):167-72.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-86702008000300002
Ministério da Saúde (BR). DATASUS. SINASC: Sistema de Informações sobre Nascidos Vivos por ocorrência por ano do nascimento segundo número de consultas de pré-natal. 2019 [cited 2022 Mar 18]. Available from: http://svs.aids.gov.br/dantps/centrais-de-conteudos/paineis-de-monitoramento/natalidade/nascidos-vivos/.
Benzaken AS, Pereira GFM, Cunha ARC, Souza FMA, Saraceni V. Adequacy of prenatal care, diagnosis and treatment of syphilis in pregnancy: a study with open data from Brazilian state capitals. Cad Saude Publica. 2019;36(1):e00057219.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00057219
Leal MC, Esteves-Pereira AP, Viellas EF, Domingues RMSM, Gama SGN. Prenatal care in the Brazilian public health services. Rev Saude Publica. 2020;54:08. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001458
Domingues RMSM, Viellas EF, Dias MAB, Torres JA, Thene-Filha MM, Gama SGN, Leal MCl. Adequação da assistência pré-natal segundo as características maternas no Brasil. Rev Panam Salud Publica/Pan Am J Public Heal. 2015;37(3):140-7.
Victora CG, Matijasevich A, Silveira M, Santos I, Barros AJ, Barros FC. Socio-economic and ethnic group inequities in antenatal care quality in the public and private sector in Brazil. Health Policy Plan. 2010;25(4):253-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czp065
Domingues RMSM, Leal MC, Hartz ZMA, Dias MAB, Vettore MV. Access to and utilization of prenatal care services in the Unified Health System of the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2013;16(4):953-65.
Tomasi E, Fernandes PAA, Fischer T, et al. Qualidade da atenção pré-natal na rede básica de saúde do Brasil: Indicadores e desigualdades sociais. Cad Saude Publica. 2017;33(3):1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-790X2013000400015
Moller A-B, Petzold M, Chou D, Say L. Early antenatal care visit: a systematic analysis of regional and global levels and trends of coverage from 1990 to 2013. Lancet Glob Heal. 2017;5(10):e977-83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30325-X
Mario DN, Rigo L, Boclin KLS, Malvestio LMM, Anziliero D, Horta BL, et al. Quality of prenatal care in Brazil: National Health Research 2013. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2019 Mar;24(3):1223-32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018243.13122017
Silva EP, Lima RT, Costa MJDC, Batista Filho M. Desenvolvimento e aplicação de um novo índice para avaliação do pré-natal. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;33(5):356-62.
Guimarães WSG, Parente RCP, Guimarães TLF, Garnelo L. Acesso e qualidade da atenção pré-natal na Estratégia Saúde da Família: infraestrutura, cuidado e gestão. Cad Saude Publica. 2018;34(5):e0011417.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00110417
Cunha AC, Lacerda JT, Alcauza MTR, Natal S. Evaluation of prenatal care in Primary Health Care in Brazil. Rev Bras Saúde Matern Infant. 2019 abr-jun;19(2):447-58. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042019000200011
Dode MASO, Santos IS. Validade do auto-relato de diabete mellitus gestacional no pós-parto imediato. Cad Saude Publica. 2009 fev;25(2):251-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2009000200003
Gonzalez TN, Cesar JA. Posse e preenchimento da Caderneta da Gestante em quatro inquéritos de base populacional. Rev Bras Saúde Mater Infant. 2019 abr-jun;19(2):383-90. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042019000200007
Ministério da Saúde (BR) Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Portaria Nº 306, de 28 de Março de 2016. Aprova as Diretrizes de Atenção à Gestante: a operação cesariana. Diário Oficial União. 2016 Mar 29.
Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7
Ramires de Jesus G, Ramires de Jesus N, Peixoto-Filho FM, Lobato G. Caesarean rates in Brazil: what is involved? BJOG. 2015 Apr;122(5):606-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13119
Domingues RMSM, Dias MAB, Nakamura-Pereira M, Torres JA, Orsi E, Pereira APE, et al. Process of decision-making regarding the mode of birth in Brazil: from the initial preference of women to the final mode of birth. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30 Suppl 1:S1-16. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00105113
Fabbro MRC, Wernet M, Baraldi NG, Bussadori JCC, Salim NR, Souto BGA, et al. Antenatal care as a risk factor for caesarean section: a case study in Brazil. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):731. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05008-z
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Aline De Gregori Adami, Leonardo Rapone da Motta, Rosa Dea Sperhacke, Sérgio Kakuta Kato, Gerson Fernando Mendes Pereira, Rosa Maria Rahmi
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.