The image in postmodern culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20702010000100009Keywords:
Image, Post-modernism, Culture, Flexible accumulation, DematerializationAbstract
In this paper, our main goal is to offer some relevant clues as to the framing of images in the cultural logic of post-modernism. At the same time, we will give space to a brief description of the relation between post-modernism and flexible accumulation, the generative substratum from which our subject derives. Along with this, we conceptualize theses on imagetic transmutation, the primacy of the image and the effect of dematerialization induced by the image in the perception of social relations. In this way, a conceptual chain is constituted with the purpose of connecting only apparently fragmented phenomena and social processes such as the productive basis of contemporary capitalism, its cultural reality and the place of the image in all that wide framing.Downloads
References
ANDERSON, Perry. (1998), The origins of postmodernity. Londres, Verso.
ANTUNES, Ricardo. (2006), “A era da informatização e a época da informalização: riqueza e miséria do trabalho no Brasil”. In: _____ (org.). Riqueza e miséria do trabalho no Brasil. São Paulo, Boitempo, pp.15-25.
BAUDRILLARD, Jean. (1983), For a critique of the political economy of the sign. Nova York, Telos Press.
BELL, Daniel. (1976), The coming of post-industrial society. Nova York, Basic Books.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. (2001), Razões Práticas: sobre a teoria da acção. Oeiras, Celta.
_____. (1998), O que falar quer dizer: a economia das trocas linguísticas. Lisboa, Difel.
BRAVERMAN, Harry. (1974), Labor and monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century. Nova York, Monthly Review Press.
CASTELLS, Manuel. (2005), La era de la información. Volume 1: La sociedad red. 3 ed. Madri, Alianza Editorial.
CHOSSUDOVXKY, Michel. (2003), A globalização da pobreza e a nova ordem mundial. Lisboa, Caminho.
EAGLETON, Terry. (1996), The illusions of postmodernism. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.
ECO, Umberto. (1989), Obra aberta. Lisboa, Difel.
FEATHERSTONE, Mike. (1996), Consumer culture and postmodernism. Londres, Sage.
HARVEY, David. (1990), The condition of postmodernity. Oxford/Cambridge, Basil Blackwell.
IANNI, Octavio. (1999), Língua e sociedade. Primeira versão, Campinas, 84: 1-65, abril. [Não seriam estes os dados: IANNI, Octávio. (1999), “Língua e sociedade”. In: VALENTE, André (org.). Aulas de Português. Petrópolis: Vozes.]
JAMESON, Fredric. (1993), Postmodernism or the cultural logic of late capitalism. Londres, Verso.
JAUSS, Robert Hans. (1978), Pour une esthétique de la recéption. Paris, Gallimard.
LASH, Scott & URRY, John. (1987), The end of organised capitalism. Oxford, Polity Press.
LYOTARD, Jean-François. (1984), The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
MARX, Karl. (1990), O capital. Livro Primeiro, Tomo I. Lisboa, Avante.
_____. (1991), Capital. Book III: The process of capitalist production as a whole. Londres, Penguin Books.
RORTY, Richard. (1993), “O progresso do pragmatista”. In: COLLINI, Stefan (org.). Interpretação e sobreinterpretação. Lisboa, Presença, pp.132-169.
SANTOS, Boaventura Sousa. (2003), Produzir para viver: os caminhos da produção não capitalista. Porto, Afrontamento.
WALLERSTEIN, Immanuel. (1990), O sistema mundial moderno: a agricultura capitalista e as origens da economia-mundo europeia no século XVI. Porto, Afrontamento.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Tempo Social
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
