Confiabilidade do dispositivo PhysioPlay™ para avaliar o tempo de reação de pacientes com câncer

Autores

  • Júlia da Costa Anciães Universidade Federal de Alfenas - UNIFAL
  • Ricardo da Silva Alves Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí
  • Paola de Paula Silva Pereira Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí
  • Eduarda Suellen Figueiredo Silva do Nascimento Universidade Federal de Alfenas - UNIFAL
  • Denise Hollanda Iunes Universidade Federal de Alfenas - UNIFAL
  • Paulo Alexandre Bressan Universidade Federal de Alfenas - UNIFAL
  • Leonardo César Carvalho Universidade Federal de Alfenas - UNIFAL

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v27i4a180347

Palavras-chave:

Neoplasias/Reabilitação, Jogos de Vídeo, Realidade Virtual, Tempo de Reação

Resumo

Objetivo: Determinar a confiabilidade intra-avaliador e inter-avaliador da interação Physioplay-Kinect e do dispositivo Trigno para avaliar o tempo de reação (TR) de voluntários com câncer em tratamento. Métodos: 46 voluntários com câncer em tratamento participaram do estudo e foram distribuídos em três grupos: Grupo de Quimioterapia (GQ), Grupo de Radioterapia (GR), e Grupo de Quimioterapia-Radioterapia (GQR). O TR para todos os voluntários foi avaliado utilizando o dispositivo PhysioPlay™ e Trigno. Resultados: Na análise intra-avaliador, foram observados excelentes níveis de confiabilidade (Physioplay: ICC> 0,99; Trigno 8: ICC>0,92) em todos os grupos. Na análise inter-avaliador, foram observados excelentes níveis de confiabilidade no GQ (Physioplay: ICC= 0,98; Trigno 8: ICC= 0,98); excelente (Physioplay: ICC= 0,98) e bom (Trigno 8: ICC= 0,44) níveis no GR; bons (Physioplay: ICC= 0,49) e razoáveis (Trigno 8: ICC= 0,29) níveis no GQR. Conclusão: Os dispositivos PhysioPlay™ e Trigno provaram ser confiáveis para avaliar o TR de voluntários com câncer em tratamento.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Pojskic H, Pagaduan J, Uzicanin E, Separovic V, Spasic M, Foretic N, et al. Reliability, validity and usefulness of a new response time test for agility-based sports: a simple vs. complex motor task. J Sports Sci Med. 2019;18(4):623-635.

Wong AL, Haith AM, Krakauer JW. Motor Planning. Neuroscientist. 2015;21(4):385-98. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858414541484

Grol MJ, Lange FP, Verstraten FA, Passingham RE, Toni I. Cerebral changes during performance of overlearned arbitrary visuomotor associations. J Neurosci. 2006;26(1):117-25. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2786-05.2006

Kurata K, Hoshi E. Movement-related neuronal activity reflecting the transformation of coordinates in the ventral premotor cortex of monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 2002;88(6):3118-32. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00070.2002

Otaki M, Shibata K. The effect of different visual stimuli on reaction times: a performance comparison of young and middle-aged people. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019;31(3):250-254. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.31.250

Ashby FG, Isen AM, Turken AU. A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychol Rev. 1999;106(3):529-50. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.106.3.529

Jain A, Bansal R, Kumar A, Singh KD. A comparative study of visual and auditory reaction times on the basis of gender and physical activity levels of medical first year students. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2015;5(2):124-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.157168

Sparrow WA, Begg RK, Parker S. Aging effects on visual reaction time in a single task condition and when treadmill walking. Motor Control. 2006;10(3):201-11. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/mcj.10.3.201

Waskiewicz Z. Information Processes, Stimulation and Perceptual Training in Fencing. J Hum Kinet 2008;19:63-82. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-008-0005-y

Lidor R, Ziv G. Physical and physiological attributes of female volleyball players--a review. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(7):1963-73. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ddf835

Malik B, Stillman M. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2008;8(1):56-65. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-008-0010-5

Zajączkowska R, Kocot-Kępska M, Leppert W, Wrzosek A, Mika J, Wordliczek J. Mechanisms of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(6):1451. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20061451

Staff NP, Grisold A, Grisold W, Windebank AJ. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A current review. Ann Neurol. 2017;81(6):772-781. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24951

Savina S, Zaydiner B. Cancer-Related Fatigue: Some Clinical Aspects. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019;6(1):7-9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_45_18

Weber D, O'Brien K. Cancer and Cancer-Related Fatigue and the Interrelationships With Depression, Stress, and Inflammation. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2017;22(3):502-12. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2156587216676122

Silva Alves R, Iunes DH, Pereira IC, Borges JBC, Nogueira DA, Silva AM, et al. Influence of Exergaming on the Perception of Cancer-Related Fatigue. Games Health J. 2017;6(2):119-126. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2016.0051

Ferreira DM, Carvalho LC, Kosour C, Santos ATS, Marin LF, Santos GX, et al. Inter-and intra-rater analysis of hemiparetic shoulder abduction using PhysioPlayTM. Acta Fisiátr. 2019;26(3):123-6. Doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v26i3a166375

Lee IM, Shiroma EJ. Using accelerometers to measure physical activity in large-scale epidemiological studies: issues and challenges. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(3):197-201. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-093154

Poitras I, Bielmann M, Campeau-Lecours A, Mercier C, Bouyer LJ, Roy JS. Validity of wearable sensors at the shoulder joint: combining wireless electromyography sensors and inertial measurement units to perform physical workplace assessments. Sensors (Basel). 2019;19(8):1885. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19081885

Oliveira PF, Iunes DH, Alves RS, Carvalho JM, Menezes FS, Carvalho LC. Effects of exergaming in cancer related fatigue in the quality of life and electromyography of the middle deltoid of people with cancer in treatment: a controlled trial. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19(9):2591-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.9.2591

Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):231-40. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/15184.1

Furlan L, Sterr A. The applicability of standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change to motor learning research-a behavioral study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:95. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00095

Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2):135-60. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800204

Kimberlin CL, Winterstein AG. Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65(23):2276-84. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp070364

Ejupi A, Gschwind YJ, Brodie M, Zagler WL, Lord SR, Delbaere K. Kinect-based choice reaching and stepping reaction time tests for clinical and in-home assessment of fall risk in older people: a prospective study. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2016;13:2. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-016-0162-2

Clark RA, Pua YH, Bryant AL, Hunt MA. Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for providing lateral trunk lean feedback during gait retraining. Gait Posture. 2013;38(4):1064-6. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029

van Diest M, Stegenga J, Wörtche HJ, Postema K, Verkerke GJ, Lamoth CJ. Suitability of Kinect for measuring whole body movement patterns during exergaming. J Biomech. 2014;47(12):2925-32. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.07.017

Shahid S. Review of hematological indices of cancer patients receiving combined chemotherapy & radiotherapy or receiving radiotherapy alone. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;105:145-55. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.06.001

Macciò A, Madeddu C, Gramignano G, Mulas C, Sanna E, Mantovani G. Efficacy and safety of oral lactoferrin supplementation in combination with rHuEPO-beta for the treatment of anemia in advanced cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: open-label, randomized controlled study. Oncologist. 2010;15(8):894-902. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0020

Downloads

Publicado

2020-12-31

Edição

v. 27 n. 4 (2020)

Seção

Artigo Original

Licença

Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Fisiátrica

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Dados de financiamento

Como Citar

1.
Anciães J da C, Alves R da S, Silva Pereira P de P, Nascimento ESFS do, Iunes DH, Bressan PA, et al. Confiabilidade do dispositivo PhysioPlay™ para avaliar o tempo de reação de pacientes com câncer. Acta Fisiátr. [Internet]. 31º de dezembro de 2020 [citado 21º de novembro de 2024];27(4):242-7. Disponível em: https://periodicos.usp.br/actafisiatrica/article/view/180347