Reprodutibilidade da versão brasileira da Medida de Independência Funcional

Authors

  • Marcelo Riberto Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9549-8830
  • Margarida Harumi Miyazaki Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
  • Donaldo Jorge Filho Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
  • Hatsue Sakamoto Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina
  • Linamara Rizzo Battistella Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5275-0733

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5935/0104-7795.20010002

Keywords:

Functional Independence Measure, Reproductivity, Cultural Equivalence, Functional Evaluation, Translation

Abstract

A Brazilian version of Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was developed in a translation process to Brazilian Portuguese by a bilingual medical team and a professional translator, followed by a reverse translation to English by an independent traslator. No problems of cultural equivalence were identified in the resultant version when it was presented to a group of 25 clinicians trained in its use. Eight rehabilitation centers participated in the gathering of data for the study of reproductibility. Two independent observers evaluated, between December 1999 and January 2000, all adult stroke patients with more than 4 months of impairment onset at the same day and only one of these clinicians repeated the observation after one week (test/retest). A total of 164 patients were examined, kappa agreement values in each of the FIM items varied between two observers form 0,50 (feeding) to 0,64 (bladder control), at test/retest they varied from 0,61 (dressing below waist) to 0,77 (toilet transfer). MIF subscales showed good correlation at test/retest (Pearson: 0,91 – 0,98; ICC: 0,91 – 0,98) and between two observers (Pearson: 0,87 – 0,98; ICC: 0,87 – 0,98). Analysis of variance shows good agreement for these subscales between two observers and at test/retest condition. We conclude that the Brazilian version of FIM has good cultural equivalence and reproductivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Guide for the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (Adult FIM), version 4.0. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo; 1993.

Fleck MPA, Fachel O, Louzada S, Xavier M, Chachamovich E, Vieira G, et al. Desenvolvimento da versão em português do instrumento de avaliação de qualidade de vida da Organização Mundial da Saúde (WHOQOL - 100). Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 1999;21(1):19-28.

Küçukdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Tennant A, Süldür N, Sonel B, Aransil T. Adaptation of the modified Barthel Index for use in physical medicine and rehabilitation in Turkey. Scand J Rehabil Med. 2000;32:7-92.

Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W, Meinao I, Quaresma MR. Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Rev Bras Reumatol. 39(3):143-50,1999.

Landis K. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.

Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:1226-32.

Ottenbacher KJ, Mann WC, Granger CV, Tomita M, Hurren D, Charvat B. Inter-rater agreement and stability of functional assessment in community-based elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:1297-1301.

Smith PM, Illig SB, Fiedler RC, Hamilton BB, Ottembacher KJ. Intermodal agreement of follow-up telephone functional assessment using the functional independence measure in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:431-5.

Andresen EM. Criteria assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;81(suppl 2):S15-S20.

Grey N, Kennedy P. The functional independence measure: a comparative study of clinician and self-ratings. Paraplegia. 1993;31:457-61.

Segal ME, Ditunno JF, Staas WE. Interinstitutional agreement of individual Functional Independence Measure (FIM) items measured at two sites on one sample of SCI patients. Paraplegia. 1993;31:622-31.

Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:127-32.

Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD. Performance profiles of the functional independence measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;72:84-9.

Chang W, Chan C. Rasch analysis for outcome measures: some methodological considerations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:934-9.

Stineman MG, Goin JE, Granger CV, Fiedler R, Willian SV. Discharge motor FIM-function related groups. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:980-5.

Stineman MG, Fiedler R, Granger CV, Maislin G. Functional task benchmarks for stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:497-504.

Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger CV. Prediction of rehabilitation outcomes with disability measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:133-43.

Cohen ME, Marino RJ. The tools of disability outcome research functional status measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;81(suppl 2):S21-S29.

Published

2001-04-09

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

1.
Riberto M, Miyazaki MH, Jorge Filho D, Sakamoto H, Battistella LR. Reprodutibilidade da versão brasileira da Medida de Independência Funcional. Acta Fisiátr. [Internet]. 2001 Apr. 9 [cited 2024 Jul. 18];8(1):45-52. Available from: https://periodicos.usp.br/actafisiatrica/article/view/102274