Clinical and demographical profile of chronic muscleskeletal pain patients assisted at Brazilian Health Public System

Authors

  • José Eduardo Martinez Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Sorocaba, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
  • Ana Carolina Macedo Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Sorocaba, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
  • Daniel Faria de Campos Pinheiro Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Sorocaba, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
  • Fernando Correa Novato Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Sorocaba, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
  • Caio Marcelo Jorge Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Sorocaba, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
  • Danielle Trevisani Teixeira Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Sorocaba, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v11i2a102479

Keywords:

Health System/standards, Clinical Features, Chronic Pain

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the demographic and clinical profile of patients with muscle-skeletal chronic pain.  One hundred and fifty patients were evaluated, being divided in three groups according to the clinical setting of origin: Basic Unit of Health (BUH), City Specialty Clinic (CSC) and University Clinic (UC).It was observed a strong female predominance in the three groups.(BUH - 74%; CSC - 66%; UC - 80%). The observed age distribution showed that most of the patients from BUH were above 60 years old (50%) and most patients of the other two units were between 41 and 60 years old. In relation to joint distribution, most part of patients at the BHU presented with involvement of less than 4 joints (60%) and at the UC more than 4 joints (60%). At the CSC, most of the complains were localized at the vertebral spine. Unspecific diagnoses were reported more often at the BUH (40%) than at the CSC (20%) and UC (16%). There were less discontinuation of treatment at the UC in relation to the BUH and CSC. At the BHU 28% of patients reported continuous treatment in comparison to 74% of the CSC and 92% at UC. At worsening of pain, most patients of BHU used self-medication, while at the CSC and UC patients followed medical prescription. It was concluded that the secondary and tertiary levels of health institutions (CSC, UC) are able to treat pain patients with diseases of higher complexity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Martinez JE, Ferraz MB, Sato EI, Atra E. Fibromyalgia vs rheumatoid arthritis: a longitudinal comparison of quality of life. J Rheumatol. 1995;22:201-4.

Teixeira MJ, Pimenta CAM. Epidemiologia da dor. In: Teixeira MJ. Dor: conceitos gerais. São Paulo: Limay; 1995.

Cailliet R. Dor: mecanismos e tratamento. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas;1999.

Garcia MLB, Calich I. Artrites e artralgias. In: Martins MA, Beseñor IM, Atta JA. Semiologia clínica. São Paulo: Sarvier; 2002. p. 566-574.

Uhligh T, Hagen KB, Kvien TK. Why do patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders consult their primary care physicians? Current Opinion in Rheumatology. 2002;14:104-8.

Rerola KE, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemis S, Takada J. Use of primary health services in sparcely populated country districts aby patients with musculoskeletal symptoms: consultation with a physician. J Epidemil Community Health. 1993;47:153-7.

Fleisher AB, Gardner EF, Feldman SR. Are patients' chief complains generally specific to one organ system? Am J Manag Care. 2001;7:299-305.

Katz JN, Barret J, Liang MH, Kaplan H, Roberts WN, Baron JA. Utilization of rheumatology physician services by elderly. Am J Med. 1998;105:312-8.

Games-Nava JI, Gonzales-Lopes L, Davis P, Suarez-Almazor ME. Referral and diagnosis of common rheumatic diseases by primary care physicians. Br J Rheumatol. 1988;11:326-34.

Published

2004-08-09

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

1.
Martinez JE, Macedo AC, Pinheiro DF de C, Novato FC, Jorge CM, Teixeira DT. Clinical and demographical profile of chronic muscleskeletal pain patients assisted at Brazilian Health Public System. Acta Fisiátr. [Internet]. 2004 Aug. 9 [cited 2024 Jul. 18];11(2):67-71. Available from: https://periodicos.usp.br/actafisiatrica/article/view/102479