Comparative study on the cervical range of motion in elderly individuals with different fitness levels

Authors

  • Cristiano Oliveira de Carvalho Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
  • Denis Aron dos Santos Magalhães Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
  • José Alberto Alves Silva Junior Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
  • Luis Flávio Horta Bicalho Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
  • Ana Paula Bitarães Costa Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
  • Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
  • Vânia Ferreira de Figueiredo Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v13i3a102737

Keywords:

Range of Motion, Cervical Spine, Elderly

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the cervical range of motion (ROM) in elderly people with different fitness levels. Methods: Forty asymptomatic volunteers aged between 60-75 years old were recruited and classified based on their respective fitness level. The volunteers were then submitted to the measurement of cervical ROM with the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) inclinometer by a blinded examiner. An intrarater reliability test was also performed to evaluate the examiner's reproducibility. Results: There were no significant differences regarding flexion and extension movements in both groups. The lateral right and left flexion and right and left rotation were statistically higher in the fitness group compared to the sedentary individuals. Conclusion: We concluded that the fitness level can be beneficial to preserve cervical ROM in elderly people.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Costa APBC, Costa LOP. Estudo comparativo das amplitudes de movimento da coluna cervical entre jovens de 20 a 29 anos e adultos de 50 a 59 anos. Fisioter mov. 2004;17(1):25-30.

Dvorak J, Panjabi MM, Grob D, Novotny JE, Antinnes JA. Clinical validation of functional flexion/extension radiographs of the cervical spine. Spine. 1993;18(1):120-7.

Feipel V, Rondelet B, Le Pallec J, Rooze M. Normal global motion of the cervical spine: an electrogoniometric study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999;14(7):462-70.

Kuhlman KA.Cervical range of motion in the elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74(10):1071-9.

Lind B, Sihlbom H, Nordwall A, Malchau H. Normal range of motion of the cervical spine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70(9):692-5.

Ordway NR, Seymour R, Donelson RG, Hojnowski L, Lee E, Edwards WT. Cervical sagittal range-of-motion analysis using three methods. Cervical range-of-motion device, 3space, and radiography. Spine. 1997;22(5):501-8.

Sforza C, Grassi G, Fragnito N, Turci M, Ferrario V. Three-dimensional analysis of active head and cervical spine range of motion: effect of age in healthy male subjects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002;17(8):611-4.

Cunningham DA, Paterson DH, Himann JE, Rechnitzer PA. Determinants of independence in the elderly. Can J Appl Physiol. 1993;18(3):243-54.

McClure P, Siegler S, Nobilini R. Three-dimensional flexibility characteristics of the human cervical spine in vivo. Spine. 1998;23(2):216-23.

Rydwik E, Frandin K, Akner G. Effects of physical training on physical performance in institutionalised elderly patients (70+) with multiple diagnoses. Age Ageing. 2004;33(1):13-23.

Dvorak J, Antinnes JA, Panjabi M, Loustalot D, Bonomo M. Age and gender related normal motion of the cervical spine. Spine. 1992;17(10 Suppl):S393-8.

Kay TM, Gross A, Goldsmith C, Santaguida PL, Hoving J, Bronfort G, et al. Exercises for mechanical neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(3):CD004250.

American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Baltmore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.

Jordan K. Assessment of published reliability studies for cervical spine range-of-motion measurement tools. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23(3):180-95.

Rheault W, Albright B, Byers C. Intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device. J Orthopaed Sports Phys Ther. 1992;15:147-50.

Nilsson N. Measuring passive cervical motion: a study of reliability. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995;18(5):293-7.

Hole DE, Cook JM, Bolton JE. Reliability and concurrent validity of two instruments for measuring cervical range of motion: effects of age and gender. Man Ther. 1995;1(1):36-42.

Youdas JW, Carey JR, Garrett TR. Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion--comparison of three methods. Phys Ther. 1991;71(2):98-106.

Youdas JW, Garrett TR, Suman VJ, Bogard CL, Hallman HO, Carey JR. Normal range of motion of the cervical spine: an initial goniometric study. Phys Ther. 1992;72(11):770-80.

Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: Wiley & Sons; 1986.

Norkin CC, Levangie PK. Articulaçoes estrutura e funçao: uma abordagem prática e abrangente. 2a ed. Sao Paulo: Revinter; 2001.

Bemben MG. Age-related physiological alterations to muscles and joints and potential exercise interventions for their improvement. J Okla State Med Assoc. 1999;92(1):13-20.

Published

2006-12-09

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

1.
Carvalho CO de, Magalhães DA dos S, Silva Junior JAA, Bicalho LFH, Costa APB, Costa LOP, et al. Comparative study on the cervical range of motion in elderly individuals with different fitness levels. Acta Fisiátr. [Internet]. 2006 Dec. 9 [cited 2024 Jul. 18];13(3):147-51. Available from: https://periodicos.usp.br/actafisiatrica/article/view/102737