Developing Human Functioning and Rehabilitation Research from a comprehensive perspective

Authors

  • Gerold Stucki Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • Jan Dietrich Reinhardt University of Lucerne
  • Gunnar Grimby University of Gothenburg
  • John Melvin Thomas Jefferson University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v15i1a102915

Keywords:

International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Research, Disabled Persons, Rehabilitation

Abstract

By creating the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) the World Health Organization (WHO) prepared the ground for a comprehensive understanding of Human Functioning and Rehabilitation Research, integrating the biomedical perspective on impairment with the social model of disability. This new understanding poses a number of old and new challenges related to the enhancement of adequate research capacity. Here we will summarize approaches to address these challenges with respect to three areas: the organization of Human Functioning and Rehabilitation Research into distinct scientific fields, the development of suitable academic training programs and the building of university centers and collaboration networks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO Publishing; 2001.

Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962.

Zola IK. Toward the necessary universalizing of a disability policy. Milbank Q. 1989;67(Suppl 2 Pt 2):401-28.

Bickenbach JE, Chatterji S, Badley EM, Ustün TB. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(9):1173-87.

Grimby G, Melvin J, Stucki G. The ICF: A unifying model for the conceptualization, organization and development of human functioning and rehabilitation research. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(4):277-8.

Stucki G, Cieza A, Melvin J. The international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): A unifying model for the conceptual description of the rehabilitation strategy. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(4):279-85.

Stucki G, Melvin J. The international classification of functioning, disability and health: A unifying model for the conceptualdescription of physical and rehabilitation medicine. J Rehabil Med 2007;39(4):286-92.

World Health Assembly, Resolution R114: Disability, including prevention, management and rehabilitation. Adopted May 2005. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.

Fineberg HV. Science and medicine in the 21st century: opportunities for rehabilitation medicine. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(12):928-31.

Frontera WR, Fuhrer MJ, Jette AM, Chan L, Cooper RA, Duncan PW, et al. Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: building research capacity. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(12):913-7.

Grabois M. Through the looking glass: a personal view of the field of rehabilitation medicine. The 56th John Stanley Coulter Memorial Lecture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(4):408-12.

Stucki G. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): a promising framework and classification for rehabilitation medicine. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(10):733-40.

Stucki G, Celio M. Developing human functioning and rehabilitation research. Part II: Interdisciplinary university centers and national and regional collaboration networks. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(4):334-42.

Whyte J. Training and retention of rehabilitation researchers. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(12):969-75.

Stucki G. Developing human functioning and rehabilitation research. Part I: Academic training programs. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(4):323-33.

Frontera WR, Fuhrer MJ, Jette AM, Chan L, Cooper RA, Duncan PW, et al. Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: building research capacity. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(12):913-7.

Stucki G, Grimby G. Organizing human functioning and rehabilitation research into distinct scientific fields. Part I: Developing a comprehensive structure from the cell to society. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(4):293-8.

Stucki G, Reinhardt JD, Grimby G. Organizing human functioning and rehabilitation research into distinct scientific fields. Part II: Conceptual descriptions and domains for research. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(4):299-307.

Reinhardt JD, Hofer P, Arenz S, Stucki G. Organizing human functioning and rehabilitation research into distinct scientific fields. Part III: Scientific journals. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(4):308-22.

Wang PP, Badley EM, Gignac M. Exploring the role of contextual factors in disability models.Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(2):135-40.

Bartlett DJ, Macnab J, Macarthur C, Mandich A, Magill-Evans J, Young NL, et al. Advancing rehabilitation research: an interactionist perspective to guide question and design. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(19):1169-76.

Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173-202.

Stucki G, Reinhardt JD, Cieza A, Brach M, Celio M, Joggi D, et al. Developing swiss paraplegic research: Building a research institution from the comprehensive perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;1-16 [Epub ahead of print].

Piaget J. The epistemiology of interdisciplinary relationships. In: Apostel L, Berger G, Briggs A, Machaud G, editors. Interdisciplinarity - problems of teaching and research at universities. Paris: OECD, 1972; p.127-39.

Rosenfield PL. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35(11):1343-57.

Published

2008-03-09

Issue

Section

Tendencies and Reflections

How to Cite

1.
Stucki G, Reinhardt JD, Grimby G, Melvin J. Developing Human Functioning and Rehabilitation Research from a comprehensive perspective. Acta Fisiátr. [Internet]. 2008 Mar. 9 [cited 2024 Jul. 18];15(1):63-9. Available from: https://periodicos.usp.br/actafisiatrica/article/view/102915