Reliability of a goniometry application for mobile device (Android): Goniôapp
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v26i1a163302Keywords:
Arthrometry, Articular, Range of Motion, Articular, Mobile ApplicationsAbstract
Goniometry is a technique used to evaluate a range of motion (ROM) of the joints of the human body. The universal goniometer is the instrument most used by physiotherapists to evaluate an ROM. The Goniôapp application was developed with a function of a universal goniometer to evaluate an ROM. Objective: To evaluate whether the goniometry application for mobile devices (Android), Goniôapp, presents results for the universal goniometer in the evaluation of healthy WMD. Method: An applied research was conducted in the technology validation modality, in physiotherapy students of Ulbra Torres RS. Primeved was signed the TCLE, and collected the demographic data. After having done an assessment of the glenohumeral joint on the right side in 10 male students and 34 female, by three evaluators who evaluate as two measures measured, universal goniometer and Goniôapp. Results: A moderate inter-examiner reliability level was verified for extension, flexion, abduction and external rotation among all the evaluators. In the intra-examiner reliability assessment, the evaluator 1 and 2 presented a high level of reliability for the movement of extension and the other movements presented moderate level, however, only the evaluator 3 presented a high level for all the movements. Conclusion: At the end of the present research, a goniometry application for mobile device (Android) was concluded, Goniôapp presents results similar to the GU technique, both results had a moderate IC both intra and between evaluators.
Downloads
References
Marques AP. Manual de Goniometria. 2 ed. São Paulo: Manole; 2003.
Hammons D, McChesney JW, Curtin M, Pfeiffer P, Thiede K. Randomized and Blinded Study for the Treatment of Glenohumeral Internal Rotation of Motion Restriction: The Prone-Passive Stretching Technique. JSMAHS. 2015; 2(1):1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25035/jsmahs.01.02.05
Wilk KE, Williams Jr RA, Dugas JR, Cain Jr L, Andrews JR. Current concepts in the assessment and rehabilitation of the thrower’s shoulder. Operative Tech Sports Med. 2016;24(3):170-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.otsm.2016.04.004
van Saase JL, van Romunde LK, Cats A, Vandenbroucke JP, Valkenburg HA. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Zoetermeer survey. Comparison of radiological osteoarthritis in a Dutch population with that in 10 other populations. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989;48(4):271-80.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.48.4.271
Blagojevic M, Jinks C, Jeffery A, Jordan KP. Risk factors for onset of osteoarthritis of the knee in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18(1):24-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2009.08.010
Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation -United States, 2007-2009. MMWR. 2010;59(39):1261-5.
Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Dieppe PA, Hirsch R, Helmick CG, Jordan JM, et al. Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1: the disease and its risk factors. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(8):635-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-133-8-200010170-00016
Dambros C, Martimbianco AL, Polachini LO, Lahoz GL, Chamlian TR, Cohen M. Effectiveness of cryotherapy after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20(5):285-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-78522012000500008
Cavalcante MLC, Teixeira PRL, Souza TCS, Lima POP, Oliveira RR. Índice de fadiga do músculo quadríceps femoral em atletas de futebol após reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior. Rev Bras Ortop. 2016;51(5):535–40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2015.12.002
Kolber MJ, Hanney WJ. Kolber MJ, Hanney WJ. The reliability and concurrent validity of shoulder mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer and goniometer: a technical report. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(3):306-13.
Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry. 4 ed. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis; 2009.
Clarkson HM. Joint motion and function assessment: a research-based practical guide. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
Souza JA, Pasinato F, Basso D, Correa ECR, Silva AMT. Biofotogrametria confiabilidade das medidas do protocolo do software para avaliação postural (SAPO). Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2011;13(4):299-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2011v13n4p299
Baraúna MA, Canto RST, Schulz E, Silva RAV, Campelo CD, et al. Avaliação da amplitude de movimento do ombro em mulheres mastectomizadas pela biofotogrametria computadorizada. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2004;50(1):27-31.
Ribeiro CRS, Oliveira AIS, Santos TC, Carvalho EAN, Bonjardim LR, Ferreira APL. Validação do software Inkscape como instrumento de avaliação postural. ConScientiae Saúde, 2012;11(3):454-61.
Dohnert MB, Tomasi E. Validade da fotogrametria computadorizada na detecção de escoliose idiopática adolescente. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2008;12(4):290-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552008000400007
Pan D, Dhall R, Lieberman A, Petitti DB. A mobile cloud-based Parkinson's disease assessment system for home-based monitoring. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(1):e29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.3956
Wong SJ, Robertson GA, Connor KL, Brady RR, Wood AM. Smartphone apps for orthopaedic sports medicine - a smart move? BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2015;7:23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-015-0017-6
Silva GG. Aplicativo de goniometria para dispositivo móvel (Android®) [Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso]. Torres (RS): Universidade Luterana do Brasil; 2016.
Jones A, Sealey R, Crowe M, Gordon S. Concurrent validity and reliability of the Simple Goniometer iPhone app compared with the Universal Goniometer. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014;30(7):512-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2014.900835
Bedekar N, Suryawanshi M, Rairikar S, Sancheti P, Shyam A. Inter and intra-rater reliability of mobile device goniometer in measuring lumbar flexion range of motion. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27(2):161-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-130431
Wellmon RH, Gulick DT, Paterson ML, Gulick CN. Validity and Reliability of 2 Goniometric Mobile Apps: Device, Application, and Examiner Factors. J Sport Rehabil. 2016;25(4):371-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2015-0041
Pourahmadi MR, Ebrahimi Takamjani I, Sarrafzadeh J, Bahramian M, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Rajabzadeh F, et al. Reliability and concurrent validity of a new iPhone® goniometric application for measuring active wrist range of motion: a cross-sectional study in asymptomatic subjects. J Anat. 2017;230(3):484-495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12568
Sacco ICN, Alibert S, Queiroz BWC, Pripas D, Kieling I, Kimura AA, et al. Confiabilidade da fotogrametria em relação a goniometria para avaliação postural de membros inferiores. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2007;11(5):411-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552007000500013
Silva RLF, Coelho RR, Barreto GA, Aguiar JP, Dantas EHM. Comparação entre a avaliação da amplitude articular estática do cotovelo por meio de três diferentes métodos: goniometria, biofotogrametria e goniometria da imagem radiológica. Fisioter Bras. 2009;10(2):106-112. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33233/fb.v10i2.1511
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Fisiátrica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
