Reproducibility of the test of 10 maximum repetitions in elderly
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v29i3a182604Keywords:
Endurance Training, Muscle Strength, Reproducibility of Results, AgedAbstract
Little is known about the number of sessions required to stabilize the maximum load in 10 repetitions in untrained older adults. Objective: The objective of the study was to verify the reproducibility of the 10 MR test in women over 60 years of age who have no previous experience with strength training. Method: Twenty-two elderly women (67.73 ± 5.43 years) participating only in the Prev Quedas gymnastics program performed the 10 MR test-retest sessions in four exercises: extension chair, triceps in the pulley, flexor table, and biceps curl. The Prev Quedas program is an extension program that offers physical activities to the public of all ages free of charge to contribute to the prevention of falls. One-way ANOVA tests with Bonferroni post hoc, Bland-Altman plot, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval were used. Results: Reproducibility levels were excellent in all exercises, varying from 0.83 to 0.95, with no significant difference between sessions. The agreement between the test-retest sessions was classified as good for all exercises. The literature shows a lack regarding the reproducibility of the 10 MR tests, mainly for the elderly. However, the reproducibility data of the present study agree with those referring to the 1 MR tests applied to young adults. Conclusion: Based on the findings presented, there seems to be a need for 2 evaluation sessions to stabilize the load in 10 maximum repetitions for untrained elderly women.
Downloads
References
Burton E, Farrier K, Lewin G, Pettigrew S, Hill AM, Airey P et al. Motivators and barriers for older people participating in resistance training: a systematic review. J Aging Phys Act. 2017;25(2):311‐24. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/japa.2015-0289
Correa CS, Cunha G, Marques N, Oliveira-Reischak Ã, Pinto R. Effects of strength training, detraining and retraining in muscle strength, hypertrophy and functional tasks in older female adults. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2016;36(4):306‐10. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12230
Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Sen A, Gordon PM. Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2010;9:226-37. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2010.03.004
Frank P, Andersson E, Pontén M, Ekblom B, Ekblom M, Sahlin K. Strength training improves muscle aerobic capacity and glucose tolerance in elderly. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016;26(7):764‐73. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sms.12537
Huovinen V, Ivaska KK, Kiviranta R, Bucci M, Lipponen H, Sandboge S, et al. Bone mineral density is increased after a 16-week resistance training intervention in elderly women with decreased muscle strength. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;175(6):571‐82. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EJE-16-0521
Zhao R, Feng F, Wang X. Exercise interventions and prevention of fall-related fractures in older people: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(1):149‐161. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw142
Moura BM, Sakugawa RL, Orssatto LBDR, Lima LA, Pinto RS, Walker S, et al. Functional capacity improves in-line with neuromuscular performance after 12 weeks of non-linear periodization strength training in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018;30(8):959‐68. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-017-0873-x
Negaresh R, Ranjbar R, Baker JS, Habibi A, Mokhatarzade M, Gharibvand MM, et al. Skeletal muscle hypertrophy, insulin-like growth factor 1, myostatin and follistatin in healthy and sarcopenic elderly men: the effect of whole-body resistance training. Int J Prev Med. 2019;10:29. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_310_17
Botton CE, Radaelli R, Wilhelm EN, Rech A, Brown LE, Pinto RS. Neuromuscular Adaptations to Unilateral vs. Bilateral Strength Training in Women. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(7):1924‐1932. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001125
Verdijk LB, van Loon L, Meijer K, Savelberg HH. One-repetition maximum strength test represents a valid means to assess leg strength in vivo in humans. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(1):59‐68. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640410802428089
Morales J, Sobonya S. Use of submaximal repetition tests for predicting 1-RM strength in class athletes. J Strength Cond Res.1996;10(3):186-89. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-199608000-00011
Bezerra ES, Guimarães TM, Gailey AW, Leone R, Brennecke A, et al. Variabilidade da carga no teste de 10 RM em indivíduos treinados. RBPFEX. 2009; 3(18): 559-65.
Trancoso ESAF, Farinatti PTV. Efeito de 12 semanas de treinamento com pesos sobre a força muscular de mulheres com mais de 60 anos de idade. Rev Paul Educ Fís. 2002; 16(2):220-29.
Dias RMR, Avelar A, Menêses AL, Salvador EP, Silva DRP, Cyrino ES. Segurança, reprodutibilidade, fatores intervenientes e aplicabilidade de testes de 1-RM. Motriz (On line). 2013; 19(1):231-42. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-65742013000100024
Desgorces FD, Thomasson R, Aboueb S, Toussaint JF, Noirez P. Prediction of one-repetition maximum from submaximal ratings of perceived exertion in older adults pre-and post-training. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2015; 27(5):603-9. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-015-0334-3
Carpinelli RN. Assessment o fone repetition maximum (1RM) and 1 RM Prediction Equations: Are they really necessary? Med Sport. 2011; 15(2):91-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10036-011-0016-y
Dias RMR, Cyrino ES, Salvador EP, Caldeira LFS, Nakamura FY, Papst RR, et al. Influência do processo de familiarização para avaliação da força muscular em testes de 1-RM. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2005; 11:34-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-86922005000100004
Simão R, Monteiro W, Jacometo A, Tesseroli C, Teixeira GA. A influência de três diferentes intervalos de recuperação entre séries com cargas para 10 repetições máximas. Rev Bras Cien Movimento. 2006;14(3):37-44.
Dohoney P, Chromiak JA, Lemire D, Abadie BR, Kovacs C. Prediction of one repetition maximum (1-RM) strength from a 4-6 RM and a 7-10 RM submaximal strength test in healthy young adult males. J Exerc Physiol Online. 2002;5(3):54-9.
Martelli Filho JAM, Maltagliati LA, Trevisan F, Gil CTLA. Novo método estatístico para análise da reprodutibilidade. Rev Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial. 2005;10(5):122-29. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-54192005000500012
Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 2011.
Dias RMR, Avelar A, Salvador EP, Cyrino ES. Familiarização ao teste de 1-RM em mulheres com experiência previa em treinamento com pesos. Rev Educação Física/UEM. 2009; 20(3): 423-9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4025/reveducfis.v20i3.5941
Ritti-Dias RM, Avelar A, Menêses AL, Salvador EP, Silva DRP, Cyrino ES. Influence of previous experience on resistance training on reliability of one-repetition maximum test. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(5):1418-22. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181d67c4b
Phillips WT, Batterham AM, Valenzuela JE, Burkett LN. Reliability of maximal strength testing in older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85(2):329-34. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.05.010
Correa CS, Cadore EL, Kruel LFM, Pinto RS. Reprodutibilidade do Teste de 1-RM e dor muscular tardia em homens idosos saudáveis. Conexões. 2011; 9(2):1-17. Doi: https://doi.org/10.20396/conex.v9i2.8637698
Nascimento MA, Januário RSB, Gerage AM, Mayhew JL, Pina FLC, Cyrino ES. Familiarization and reability of one repetition maximum strength testing in older women. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(6):1636-42. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182717318
Vicente WJ, Weir JP. Statistics in kinesiology. Champaing: Human Kinetics: 1999.
Ploutz-Snyder LL, Giamis EL. Orientation and familiarization to 1RM strength testing in old and young women. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15(4):519-23. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200111000-00020
Selvanayagam VS, Riek S, Carrol TJ. Early neural responses to strength training. J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(2):367-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00064.2011
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Fisiátrica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
