App for motion analysis: pilot study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v29i1a194264Keywords:
Movement, Smartphone, TelemedicineAbstract
Objective: Alternative and low-cost measures may be important for analyzing human movement. The objective of this study was to verify the agreement of human movement analysis of a monitoring app that uses artificial intelligence compared to three-dimensional movement analysis. Methods: Observational cross-sectional case report study in which a healthy volunteer performed arm flexion, elbow flexion, trunk flexion, lateral trunk bending, and sitting and standing. Images of the volunteer were simultaneously captured by a three-dimensional movement analysis system based on infrared cameras and the Linkfit app of two mobile devices (smartphones). The body angles estimated by the Linkfit app were compared with the corresponding angles measured by the three-dimensional movement analysis system. The Granger causality test was used to compare the pairs of angles for each parallel data series. Results: The use of smartphone cameras and deep learning techniques for motion detection had an 84% degree of agreement compared to measurements generated by the three-dimensional movement analysis performed in the laboratory. Conclusion: The use of smartphone cameras and deep learning techniques is promising for conducting studies for body movement detection compared to the gold standard measures of movement analysis. This technology may become an alternative for movement analysis. Future studies should consider a more significant number of volunteers and model movements to strengthen the results obtained in this study.
Downloads
References
Shummay-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Controle motor. 2 ed. Barueri: Manole; 2003.
Watkins J. Structure and function of the musculoskeletal system. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1999.
Lu TW, Chang CF. Biomechanics of human movement and its clinical applications. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012;28(2 Suppl):S13-25. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2011.08.004
Sedrez JA, Furlanetto TS, Gelain GM, Candotti CT. Validity and reliability of smartphones in assessing spinal kinematics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020;43(6):635-45. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.10.012
Ventola CL. Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. P T. 2014;39(5):356-64.
Cao Z, Hidalgo G, Simon T, Wei SE, Sheikh Y. OpenPose: Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation Using Part Affinity Fields. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2021;43(1):172-86. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2929257
Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res. 1990;8(3):383-92. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100080310
del Rosario MB, Redmond SJ, Lovell NH. Tracking the evolution of smartphone sensing for monitoring human movement. Sensors (Basel). 2015;15(8):18901-33. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s150818901
Needham L, Evans M, Cosker DP, Wade L, McGuigan PM, Bilzon JL, et al. The accuracy of several pose estimation methods for 3D joint centre localisation. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):20673.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Fisiátrica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.