Open Design: sharing and democratization in design practices

Authors

  • Camilo Simão de Lima Universidade de Lisboa
  • Bruno Massara Rocha Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/gtp.v15i3.166815

Keywords:

open design, democratization, sharing, design

Abstract

In this computerized society, information sharing is not only a trend, but a form of collaborative action in creative processes. That brought great challenges for architects, urban planners and designers. Considering the wide technological revolution that occurred in the 1990s and was intensified in the beginning of the 21st century, the following question motivates investigations: the design practices production and distribution of artificial structures followed this evolution and underwent substantial changes in terms of social democratization through the sharing? This paper presents and discusses the concept of Open Design from that question’s perspective and analyzes how the practices considered “open” are placed in this current scenario of strong collaborative and experimental character, specially for architecture, design, art and creative practices in general.

We aim to broaden the debate about this creative and productive phenomenon that results from Open Design, and to offer an organized and originally systematized repertoire about the openness concept in technological practices. It is expected to contribute to the critical reflection about this global and evolving movement, instigating architects and designers to evaluate and position themselves at the informational age and the kind of professional performance it entitles.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANDERSON, Chris. Makers: the new industrial revolution. NewYork: Crown Publishing Group, 2012.

ATKINSON, P. Orchestral Manoeuvres In Design. In: Open design now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: BIS publishers, 2011. p. 24-31.

AVITAL, Michel. The Generative Bedrock of Open Design. In: VAN ABEL, B. et al. Open design now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive. Amsterdam: BIS publishers, 2011. p. 48-58.

BAUWENS, Michel. The Political Economy of Peer Production. 2005. Disponível em: https://www.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/~graebe/Texte/Bauwens-06.pdf. Acessado em: 15/02/2020.

BENKLER, Yochai. The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom.

Disponível em: http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks.pdf. Acessado em: 15/02/2020.

BOURRIAUD, N. Pós-produção: como a arte reprograma o mundo contemporâneo. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2009.

CASTELLS, M. A Sociedade em rede. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1999.

COCCO, Giuseppe; VILARIM, Gilvan. Trabalho imaterial e produção de software no capitalismo cognitivo. In: Liinc em Revista, v.5, n.2, setembro 2009, Rio de Janeiro, p. 173-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v5i2.315.

CROSS, N. Design Thinking: understanding how designers think and work. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2011.

DE MASI, Domenico. O futuro do trabalho: fadiga e ócio na sociedade pós-industrial. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: José Olympio, 2001.

DE MUL, J. Redesigning Design. In: Open design now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: BIS publishers, 2011. p. 34-39.

FILHO, João B. M. T; CRUZ Mariana M. O comum urbano em debate: dos comuns na cidade à cidade como comum? In: Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais. V.21, N.3, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22296/2317-1529.2019v21n3p487.

GIDDENS, A. Novas regras do método sociológico: uma crítica positiva às sociologias interpretativas. 2a ed. Lisboa: Gradiva, 1996.

GREENFIELD, Adam. Radical Technologies: the design of everyday life. Brooklyn, NY: Verso, 2017.

HIPPEL, E. V. Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2005.

JONES, J. C. Design Methods. 2nd. ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1992.

KADUSHIN, Ronen. Open Design Manifesto. 2010. Disponível em: https://www.ronenkadushin.com/open-design manifesto. Acessado em: 15/02/2020.

LAKHANI, Karin R.; VON HIPPEL, Eric. How open source software Works: “free” user-to-user assistance. In: Research policy, v. 32, n. 6, 2003, p. 923-943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00095-1.

LESSIG, Lawrence. Cultura Livre: como a grande mídia usa a tecnologia e a lei para bloquear a cultura e controlar a criatividade. São Paulo: Trama, 2005.

LÉVY, Pierre. As Tecnologias da Inteligência: o futuro do pensamento na era da informática. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. 34, 1998.

LIMA, Camilo S. Open Design: compartilhamento e democratização nas práticas de projeto. Dissertação de Mestrado. Orient. Prof. Dr. Bruno Massara Rocha, Março 2018. Vitória: PPGAU/UFES, 2018.

MALINI, Fábio. O valor no capitalismo cognitivo e a cultura hacker. In: Liinc em Revista, v.5, n.2, setembro, 2009, Rio de Janeiro, p.191-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v5i2.311.

MALINI, Fábio. O comunismo das redes: sistema midiático p2p, colaboração em rede e novas políticas de comunicação na internet. Tese de Doutorado. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ, 2007.

NEGRI, Antonio. A constituição do comum. Conferência Inaugural do II Seminário Internacional Capitalismo Cognitivo – Economia do Conhecimento e a Constituição do Comum. Rio de Janeiro, outubro, 2005.

NEVES, Heloisa. Maker innovation: do open design e fab labs...às estratégias inspiradas no movimento maker. Tese de Doutorado. São Paulo: FAUUSP, 2014.

OPEN KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION. 2015. Disponível em: http://opendefinition.org.

PAPANEK, V. J. Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change. 2. ed. Chicago: Academy Chicago, 2009.

ROCHA, Bruno M. Complexidade e improvisação em arquitetura. Orientador: Carlos Roberto Zibel Costa. 2015. 256 f. Tese de Doutorado São Paulo: FAUUSP, 2015.

ROCHA, Bruno M.; LIMA, Camilo S., Open Design: Principles, Interfaces and Values Analysis. XXII Congresso Internacional da Sociedade Iberoamericana de Gráfica Digital, Blucher Design Proceedings, Volume 5, 2018, Pages 1241-1249, ISSN 2318-6968. Disponível em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/sigradi2018-1451

SCHNEIDER, Christoph. Transforming TechKnowledgies: the case of open digital fabrication. Tese de Doutorado. Munique: Technische Universität München, 2017.

SENNETT, Richard. O Artífice. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Record, 2012.

STALLMAN, Richard. Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman. Boston: Free Software Foundation, 2015.

THACKARA, John. Into The Open. In: VAN ABEL, B. et al. Open Design Now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive. Amsterdam: BIS publishers, 2011. p. 42-45.

VON HIPPEL, Eric. Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2005.

WARGER, Thomas. The Open-Source Movement. Educause Quarterly, n. 3, 2002, p. 18-20.

Published

2020-11-11

How to Cite

LIMA, Camilo Simão de; ROCHA, Bruno Massara. Open Design: sharing and democratization in design practices. Gestão & Tecnologia de Projetos (Design Management and Technology), São Carlos, v. 15, n. 3, p. 6–18, 2020. DOI: 10.11606/gtp.v15i3.166815. Disponível em: https://periodicos.usp.br/gestaodeprojetos/article/view/166815.. Acesso em: 20 may. 2024.