Going through
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19940Keywords:
old judiciary psychiatric hospital, psychiatric changesAbstract
The article presents some memory of the recent past - the 80's until today, the stock that became significant at both the national and the state of São Paulo, on the movement in support of hospitalized patients in the old forensic psychiatric hospitals. It also intends, through these passages, a brief review of the complexity of dealing with the issue, despite advances in legislation on mental health in Brazil, taking into consideration some experiments at the Hospital of Custody and Psychiatric Treatment Professor André Teixeira Lima, Franco's Rocha, State of Sao Paulo.References
Manual de Legislação em Saúde Mental. Ministério da Saúde; Brasília: 2004.
Mamede MC. Cartas e retratos: uma clínica em direção è Ética. Curitiba/São Paulo: Altamira/FAPESP; 2006.
Lei Federal 10.216/2001. Ministério da Saúde. Brasília.
Ministério da Saúde. Portaria Interministerial 1777/2003. Ministério da Justiça. Brasília, 2003.
Reforma Psiquiátrica e Manicômio Judiciário: Relatório Final do Seminário para a Reorientação dos Hospitais de Custódia e Tratamento Psiquiátrico. Brasília: 2002.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
