Passagens
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19940Palabras clave:
manicômio judiciário, reforma psiquiátrica, Hospital de Custódia de Franco da RochaResumen
O artigo resgata parte da memória de um passado recente - da década de 80 até a atualidade, de ações que se tornaram significativas tanto a âmbito nacional quanto no Estado de São Paulo, sobre o movimento em defesa dos pacientes internados nos antigos manicômios judiciários. Pretende, também, através destas passagens, refletir brevemente sobre a complexidade que é tratar do tema, apesar dos avanços da legislação em saúde mental no Brasil, tendo como referencial algumas experiências no Hospital de Custódia e Tratamento Psiquiátrico Professor André Teixeira Lima, de Franco da Rocha, Estado de São Paulo.Descargas
Referencias
Manual de Legislação em Saúde Mental. Ministério da Saúde; Brasília: 2004.
Mamede MC. Cartas e retratos: uma clínica em direção è Ética. Curitiba/São Paulo: Altamira/FAPESP; 2006.
Lei Federal 10.216/2001. Ministério da Saúde. Brasília.
Ministério da Saúde. Portaria Interministerial 1777/2003. Ministério da Justiça. Brasília, 2003.
Reforma Psiquiátrica e Manicômio Judiciário: Relatório Final do Seminário para a Reorientação dos Hospitais de Custódia e Tratamento Psiquiátrico. Brasília: 2002.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
