THE SMILE: AN INDICATOR OF HAPPINESS

Authors

  • Paula Inez Cunha Gomide

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.38373

Keywords:

smile, child, young adult, institutionalization.

Abstract

This work analyses the effects of institutionalization or family life on children’s and yong adults’ smiling behavior. Man owns a universal collection of expressive movements that allows communication despite lan~uage and cultural barriers. Researchers on facial expression have verified that the smile is a powerful source of interpersonal gratification and is related to the emotional state of joy. Orphanages, slums and family environment vary in degree and frequency of emitted and correspondend smiles. Two experiments were carried out to investigate the abovementioned hypothesis. Exp I registered smiles in children of both sexes, ages between 5 and 10
years old, coming from an orphanage, a slum and a middle-class neighborhood. Exp 11 observed young adults from 14 to 21 years old, male, derived from an orphanage for law-breakers, a boarding school for law-breakers and a regular high school. The subjects were observed in playing activities. It was clearly verified that children and adolescents raised in institutions smile less than those brought up in freedom, even when in precarious social conditions as in slums. This
research indicates that institutions that isolate children and adolescents from their families strongly harm their emotional development and their happiness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Paula Inez Cunha Gomide
    Psicóloga. Profa. Dra. do Departamento de Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Paraná.

References

Ambrose JA. The development of the smiling response in early infancy. In: Foss BM, ed. Determinants of in Infant Behavior v. 1,London, Methuen, 1961.

Bowlby J. Apego. São Paulo, Martins Fontes,1984.

Blurton Jones NG. Estudos ecológicos do comportamento da criança. São Paulo, Pioneira Editora, 1972.

Bugental DE, Kaswan JW, Love LR. Perception of contradictory meanings conveyed vy verbal an nonverbal channels. J. Pers. Soe. Psycho., 16: 647-655, 1970.

Brannigan CR, Humphries DA. Comportamento não-verbal: um meio de comunicação. In: Jones NB. ed. Estudos etológicos do comportamento da criança. São Paulo, Pioneira, 1972.

Chevalier-Skolnikoff S. Facial expression of emotion in non-human primates. In: Ekmann P. ed. Darwin and facial expression. New York, Academic Press, 1973.

Cheyne JA. Development of forms and functions of smiling in pre-schoolers. Child Dev., 47: 820-823, 1976.

Darwin C. The expression of emotions in manand animais. London, Murray, 1872.

Eibsfeldt IE. Amor e ódio. Amadora, Portugal, Bertrand, 1970.

Fagundes AJ. Definição e análise de respostas de sorrir em situação de leitura de textos humorísticos. São Paulo, 1976. [Dissertação de Mestrado - instituto de Tecnologia-USP].

Gewirtz JL. The course of infants miling infour childrearing environments in Israel. In: Foss BM. ed. Determinants of infant behavior, v. 3, London, Methuen, 1965.

Goffman E. Cender advertisements. Nova York, Harper & Row, 1979.

Gomide PIC. Menor infrator: a caminho de um novo tempo. Curitiba, Juruá, 1990.

Halberstadt AG, Saitta MB. Gender nonverbal behaviour and perceived dominance: a test of teory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.,53 (2): 252-272, 1987.

Kraut RE. Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception of lying. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 36:380-391, 1978.

Lorenz K. Agressão. Portugal, Martins Fontes, 1966.

Otta E, Sarra S. Um estudo sobre o sorriso e o riso em crianças de quatro e cinco anos. Psicologia USP., 1: 13-94, 1989.

Otta E, Obara C, Bonilha R, Akamine C, Bortoletto AC, Pedrazzoli Neto M. Sorriso em bebês: reação à face humana e vários tipos de degradações deste estimulo. Rev. Bras. Cresc. Desenv. Hum., 2(2): 117-125,1992.

Otta E. O sorriso e seus significados. Petrópolis, Vozes, 1994.

Spitz RA. O primeiro ano de vida. São Paulo, Martins Fontes, 1991.

Vanhoof J A. A comparative approach to the phylogeny of laughter and smilling. In: Hinde R. ed. Non verbal communication. Cambridge University Press, 1972.

Downloads

Published

1996-12-19

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1-2 (1996)

Section

Opinião/Atualização

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis