Chronos, Kairós and the semiotics of nameless things

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v18i3p11-28

Keywords:

Peirce, semiotics, categories, pragmatism, time, nameless things

Abstract

The realism of Peirce’s philosophy continuously suggests that we conceive of a philosophy without the assumption of a subject that constitutes reality and its meaning, as is common in nominalist philosophies. Thus, in the light of realism, Semiotics extends its meaning to the universe of humanly produced signs and to those proper to the natural world. Likewise, Pragmatism, in its scope of being a semantic maxim, can be understood as applicable to natural signs and, in general, to real objects. The human and the natural, subjectivity and objectivity, interiority and exteriority, although subject to the same three categories of Peirce as a basic requirement of his realism, nevertheless remain distinguishable, without any separation that might generate an estrangement between the nature of each. Thus, it is possible to think of dimensions of time that inhabit these two universes, associated with what characterizes our human experience as well as with what is associated with a reality whose history unfolds by itself an otherness ever challenging. This essay addresses these dimensions, bringing, by means of the relation between them, the concept of nameless things and placing it at the interface of possibilities of what typifies logical discourse and what would be proper to discourse of a poetic nature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ivo Assad Ibri, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo

    Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Centro de Estudos de Pragmatismo. São Paulo – SP, Brasil

References

Barrena, S. (2007). La razón creativa: Crecimiento y finalidad del ser humano según C. S. Peirce. Rialp; Biblioteca Nueva.

Barrena, S. (2015). La belleza en Charles S. Peirce: Origen y alcance de sus ideas estéticas. Eunsa.

Calcaterra, R. M. (2015). Chance and regularities: Remarks on Richard Rorty’s contingentism. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.417

Clavere, J. (2020). The multidimensionality of semiosis: Beyond multimodality. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia, 21(1), 34-44. https://doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2020v21i1p34-44

Colapietro, V. (2017). Peirce’s pragmatist portrait of deliberative rationality. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia, 18(1), 13-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2017v18i1p13-32

Dantas, L. F. N. S. (2019). Contribuições da filosofia de Charles S. Peirce para uma investigação acerca de questões de fenomenologia e ontologia das obras de arte [Tese de Doutorado, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo]. Repositório PUC-SP. https://sapientia.pucsp.br/handle/handle/22791

De Tienne, A. (1996). L’analytique de la représentation chez Peirce: La genèse de la théorie des catégories. Publications Fac St Louis.

Dilworth, D. A. (2014). Intellectual gravity and elective attractions: The provenance of Peirce’s categories in Friedrich von Schiller. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia, 15(1), 37-72. https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/21071

Dilworth, D. A. (2016). Peirce’s transmutation of Schelling’s Philosophie der Natur. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia, 17(2), 253-290. https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/31234

Fabbrichesi, R. (2008). The Greek roots of pragmatism: A new name for an old way of thinking. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia, 9(2), 205-221. https://revistas.pucsp.br/cognitiofilosofia/article/download/12977/9452

Fabbrichesi, R. (2019). Spinoza, Emerson, and Peirce: Re-thinking the genealogy of pragmatism: 2019 Presidential address. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 55(2), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.55.2.01

Guardiano, N. (2011). The intelligibility of the metaphysics of Peirce’s objective idealism. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia, 12(2), 187-204. https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/11602

Houser, N. (2011). Action and representation in Peirce’s pragmatism. In R. M. Calcaterra (Ed.), New perspectives on pragmatism and analytic philosophy (pp. 61-69). Editions Rodopi.

Houser, N., & Kloesel, C. (Eds.). (1992). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 1). Indiana University Press.

Ibri, I. A. (2011). Peircean seeds for a philosophy of art. In K. Haworth, J. Hogue & L. G. Sbrocchi (Eds.), Semiotics 2010 (Vol. 1, pp. 1-16). Legas Publishers.

Ibri, I. A. (2015). Kósmos Noetós: A arquitetura metafísica de Charles S. Peirce. Paulus.

Ibri, I. A. (2020). Semiótica e pragmatismo: Interfaces teóricas (Vol. 1). FiloCzar; Cultura Acadêmica.

Ibri, I. A. (2021a). On the bottomless lake of firstness: Conjectures on the synthetic power of consciousness. Semiotica, 243, 129-152. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2021-0120

Ibri, I. A. (2021b). Semiótica e pragmatismo: Interfaces teóricas (Vol. 2). FiloCzar; Cultura Acadêmica.

Ibri, I. A. (2023). Between bets and rational choices: Conjectures on the fraying of time under intense action of chance. Veritas, 68(1), e44913. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2023.1.44913

Ibri, I. A. (no prelo). Rescuing forgotten signs: In search of what heralds rebirth and renewal. The American Journal of Semiotics.

Innis, R. (2022). Dimensions of aesthetic encounters: Perception, interpretation, and the signs of art (SUNY series in American philosophy and cultural thought). State University of New York Press.

Lefebvre, M. (2007). Peirce’s esthetics: A taste for signs in art. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 43(2), 319-344. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40321187

Liszka, J. (2021). Charles Peirce on ethics, esthetics and the normative sciences. Routledge.

Nubiola, J. (2021). Understanding and teaching pragmatism: “By their fruits ye shall know”. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia, 22(1), e56724. https://doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2021v22i1:e56724

Peirce, C. S. (1931-1935; 1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. Burks, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Citado CP seguido do número do volume e do número da página).

Peirce, C. S. (1992). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 1, N. Houser & C. Kloesel, Eds.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. (Citado EP seguido do número do volume e do número da página).

Santaella, L. (2004). O papel da mudança de hábito no pragmatismo evolucionista de Peirce. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia, 5(1), 75-83. https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13210

Santaella, L. (2019). Estética & semiótica. Intersaberes.

Schelling, F. W. J. (1978). System of transcendental idealism of 1800 (P. Heath, Trans.). University Press of Virginia.

Seif, F. (2020). Design and semiotics: The de-sign constitution of reality. The American Journal of Semiotics, 36(3), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs2020363/469

Published

2024-12-31

Issue

Section

Dossier

How to Cite

Ibri, I. A. (2024). Chronos, Kairós and the semiotics of nameless things. MATRIZes, 18(3), 11-28. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v18i3p11-28