Inventory in a card index form. Infatuation and sympathy: militancy and objectivity in anthroological research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/2179-0892.ra.1993.111391Keywords:
objectivity, construction of the research object, subject-object relation, cognoscent subjectAbstract
Reflecting on the delicate position of the knowing subject who is, simultaneously, the subject and object of his or her inquiry, this paper proposes to discuss the pertinency of the debate conceming objecti vity in the social sciences. lt deals with problems which the author encountered as someone who, for a brief period, was involved in a movement which was the object of her study. A possible solution to some of the dilemmas which arise in situations such as this may lie in meticulous reflection by anthropologists and sociologists on the processes of constructing their research objects.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
1993-12-17
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who intend to publish in this journal must agree with the following terms:
- a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the work to be shared as long as the author and the initial publication in this journal are appropriately credited.
- b) Authors are authorized to sign additional contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., to publish it as a book chapter), as long as the author and the initial publication in this journal are appropriately credited.
- c) Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. on their personal webpage) after the editorial process, for this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of the work. See The Effect of Open Access Publications.
How to Cite
Pontes, H. (1993). Inventory in a card index form. Infatuation and sympathy: militancy and objectivity in anthroological research. Revista De Antropologia, 36, 123-135. https://doi.org/10.11606/2179-0892.ra.1993.111391