Explanatory variables of psychological well-being: a study with postgraduates in Accounting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2023.202536Keywords:
Stress, Coping, Self-efficacy, Welfare, PostgraduatesAbstract
Previous studies have indicated the high frequency of stressors and stress in graduate studies, however, there is a need to better understand the role of coping strategies in this environment and the impact of all these variables on the well-being of students. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between stressors and self-efficacy, mediated by stress and coping, in the psychological well-being of graduate students in Accounting. To achieve the aim, an online survey was carried out, with a questionnaire consisting of the Stressors (worries and difficulties), General Self-Efficacy, Perceived Stress, Brief Cope and General Health Questionnaire (to measure well-being) scales, in addition to questions about the respondents’ profile. The sample consisted of 366 participants. It was observed that the most stressors show the fear of not achieving good results and the difficulty in reconciling the demands of graduate studies with other aspects of life. On average, students had high self-efficacy and most had a high stress level. The most used coping strategies were active coping, self-blame and positive reinterpretation. With the use of mediation analysis, it was concluded that stressors, as well as self-efficacy, are mediated by stress and by the positive reinterpretation strategy, thus explaining the psychological well-being of graduate students. In this way, the identification of the investigated variables encourages debate and provides support for the planning and execution of institutional actions that aim to alleviate stressors, as well as help students to develop greater adaptive capacity in the face of postgraduate challenges.
Downloads
References
Altoé, S. M. L., Fragalli, A. C., & Espejo, M. M. D. S. B. (2014). A “dor do crescimento”: um estudo sobre o nível de estresse em pós-graduandos de contabilidade. Revista Gestão Universitária na América Latina-GUAL, 7(1), 213-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1983-4535.2014v7n1p213
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health education & behavior,31(2), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198104263660
Bandura, A. (2008). A evolução da teoria social cognitiva. Teoria social cognitiva: conceitos básicos. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 15-41.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Barry, K. M., Woods, M., Warnecke, E., Stirling, C., & Martin, A. (2018). Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 468-483. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979
Barth, T. G., & Ensslin, S. R. (2014). O custo socioeconômico da pós-graduação stricto sensu: uma análise na percepção de mestres em contabilidade. Revista Eletrônica de Estratégia & Negócios, 7(3), 192-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.19177/reen.v7e32014192-227
Bazrafkan, L., Shokrpour, N., Yousefi, A., & Yamani, N. (2016). Management of stress and anxiety among phd students during thesis writing: a qualitative study. The health care manager, 35(3), 231-240. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCM.0000000000000120
Bodys-Cupak, I., Majda, A., Zalewska-Puchała, J., & Kamińska, A. (2016). The impact of a sense of self-efficacy on the level of stress and the ways of coping with difficult situations in Polish nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 45, 102-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.07.004
Carr, D., & Umberson, D. (2013). The social psychology of stress, health, and coping. In: J. Delamater, A., Ward. (Ed.). Handbook of social psychology (p. 465-487). Dordrecht: Springer.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(2), 267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267
Coelho, W. E., & Nascimento, E. M. (2020). A ansiedade dos mestrandos e doutorandos em contabilidade. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 14, e172020-e172020. http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2020.172020
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of health and social behavior, 385-396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
Cornwall, J., Mayland, E. C., van der Meer, J., Spronken-Smith, R. A., Tustin, C., & Blyth, P. (2018). Stressors in early-stage doctoral students. Studies in Continuing Education, 41(3), 363-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1534821
Crego, A., Carrillo-Diaz, M., Armfield, J. M., & Romero, M. (2016). Stress and academic performance in dental students: the role of coping strategies and examination‐related self‐efficacy. Journal of dental education, 80(2), 165-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2016.80.2.tb06072.x
Devos, C., Boudrenghien, G., Van der Linden, N., Azzi, A., Frenay, M., Galand, B., & Klein, O. (2016). Doctoral students’ experiences leading to completion or attrition: A matter of sense, progress and distress. European journal of psychology of education, 32(1), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0290-0JackmaHunter
DiStefano, C., & Morgan, G. B. (2014). A comparison of diagonal weighted least squares robust estimation techniques for ordinal data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915373
Dodd, A. L., Priestley, M., Tyrrell, K., Cygan, S., Newell, C., & Byrom, N. C. (2021). University student well-being in the United Kingdom: a scoping review of its conceptualisation and measurement. Journal of Mental Health, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2021.1875419
El-Ghoroury, N. H., Galper, D. I., Sawaqdeh, A., & Bufka, L. F. (2012). Stress, coping, and barriers to wellness among psychology graduate students. Training and education in professional psychology, 6(2), 122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028768
Estácio, L. S. S, Andrade, W. G. F., Kern, V. M., & de Cunha, C. J. C. A. (2019). O produtivismo acadêmico na vida dos discentes de pós-graduação. Em Questão, 25(1), 133-158. https://doi.org/10.19132/1808-5245251.133-158
Evans, T. M., Bira, L., Gastelum, J. B., Weiss, L. T., & Vanderford, N. L. (2018). Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education. Nature biotechnology, 36(3), 282-284. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4089
Faro, A. (2013a). Um modelo explicativo para o bem-estar subjetivo: estudo com mestrandos e doutorandos no Brasil. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 26, 654-662. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722013000400005
Faro, A. (2013b). Estresse e estressores na pós-graduação: estudo com mestrandos e doutorandos no Brasil. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 29, 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722013000100007
Faro, A., & Pereira, M. E. (2013). Estresse: Revisão narrativa da evolução conceitual, perspectivas teóricas e metodológicas. Psicologia, Saúde e Doenças, 14(1), 78-100.
Freire, C., Ferradás, M. D. M., Núñez, J. C., & Valle, A. (2018). Coping flexibility and eudaimonic well‐being in university students. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 59(4), 433-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12458
Gouveia, V. V., Chaves, S. S. D. S., Oliveira, I. C. P. D., Dias, M. R., Gouveia, R. S., & Andrade, P. R. D. (2003). A utilização do QSG-12 na população geral: estudo de sua validade de construto. Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa, 19, 241-248. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722003000300006
Hair, J. F. et al. Análise multivariada de dados. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005.
Hunter, K. H., & Devine, K. (2016). Doctoral students’ emotional exhaustion and intentions to leave academia. International Journal of doctoral studies, 11(2), 35-61.
Jackman, P. C., & Sisson, K. (2021). Promoting psychological well-being in doctoral students: a qualitative study adopting a positive psychology perspective. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-11-2020-0073
Kasi, P. M., Naqvi, H. A., Afghan, A. K., Khawar, T., Khan, F. H., Khan, U. Z., & Khan, H. M. (2012). Coping styles in patients with anxiety and depression. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/128672
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer publishing company.
Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017). Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Research Policy, 46(4), 868-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008
Long, R., Halvorson, M., & Lengua, L. J. (2021). A mindfulness-based promotive coping program improves well-being in college undergraduates. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2021.1895986
Luft, C. D. B., Sanches, S. D. O., Mazo, G. Z., & Andrade, A. (2007). Versão brasileira da Escala de Estresse Percebido: tradução e validação para idosos. Revista de Saúde Pública, 41, 606-615. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102007000400015
Mackinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Routledge.
Maroco, J., Campos, J. B., Bonafé, F. S., da Graça Vinagre, M., & Ribeiro, J. P. (2014). Adaptação transcultural Brasil-Portugal da Escala Brief Cope para estudantes do ensino superior. Psicologia, Saúde e Doenças, 15(2), 300-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.15309/14psd150201
Martins, V. A., da Silva, S., & da Luz, I. P. (2021). Influência da Autoestima e Relação Orientador-Orientando nos Sintomas da Síndrome de Burnout: Evidências da pós-graduação stricto sensu em contabilidade no contexto brasileiro. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade (REPeC), 15(1), 27-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.17524/repec.v15i1.2779
Meurer, A. M., Souza, A. N. M., & Costa, F. (2019). Fatores motivacionais e modificações na vida dos mestrandos em contabilidade: os dois lados de uma mesma história. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 16(38), 105-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2019v16n38p105
Meurer, A. M., Sousa, R. C. D. S., Costa, F., & Colauto, R. D. (2021). Sentimentos percebidos pelos orientandos nas fases de orientação das dissertações em contabilidade. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 32, 158-173. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1590/1808-057x202010550
Monroe, S. M. (2008). Modern approaches to conceptualizing and measuring human life stress. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.4.022007.141207
Nascimento, E. M., Garcia, M. C., & Cornacchione, E. (2021). Saúde mental dos professores de ciências contábeis: o uso de estratégias de enfrentamento do estresse. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 33, 150-166 https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202113960
Oliveira, J. F. D. (2015). A pós-graduação e a pesquisa no Brasil: processos de regulação e de reconfiguração da formação e da produção do trabalho acadêmico. Práxis Educativa, 10 (2), p.343-363. https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.10i2.0004
Organização Mundial da Saúde - World Health Organization (2018). Mental health: strengthening our response. 2018. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response
Park, K. E., Sibalis, A., & Jamieson, B. (2021). The Mental Health and Well-Being of Master’s and Doctoral Psychology Students at an Urban Canadian University. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 16, 429-447. https://doi.org/10.28945/4790
Pereira, V. H., Da Cunha, J. V. A., Avelino, B. C., & Junior, E. B. C. (2021). Percepção de pós-graduandos sobre os motivos que contribuiriam para a evasão de estudantes dos cursos stricto sensu em Contabilidade. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 15, e182882-e182882. http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2021.182882
Priesack, A., & Alcock, J. (2015). Well-being and self-efficacy in a sample of undergraduate nurse students: A small survey study. Nurse Education Today, 35(5), e16-e20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.022
Pyhältö, K., Toom, A., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Challenges of becoming a scholar: A study of doctoral students' problems and well-being. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/934941
Rezende, M. S., Miranda, G. J., Pereira, J. M., & Cornacchione, Jr, E. B. (2017). Stress e desempenho acadêmico na pós-graduação stricto sensu em ciências contábeis no Brasil. Arquivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 25(96). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2931
Ribeiro, J. L. P., & Rodrigues, A. P. (2004). Questões acerca do coping: A propósito do estudo de adaptação do Brief Cope. Psicologia, Saúde e Doenças, (1), 3-15.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 141-166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
Saleh, D., Camart, N., & Romo, L. (2017). Predictors of stress in college students. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00019
Sbicigo, J. B., Teixeira, M. A. P., Dias, A. C. G., & Dell’Aglio, D. D. (2012). Propriedades psicométricas da escala de autoeficácia geral percebida (EAGP). Psico, 43(2).
Schönfeld, P., Brailovskaia, J., Zhang, X. C., & Margraf, J. (2019). Self-efficacy as a mechanism linking daily stress to mental health in students: A three-wave cross-lagged study. Psychological reports, 122(6), 2074-2095. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118787496
Schwarzer, R., & Hallum, S. (2008). Perceived teacher self‐efficacy as a predictor of job stress and burnout: Mediation analyses. Applied psychology, 57, 152-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00359.x
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs, 35, 37.
Shilpa, S. N., & Prasad, R. (2017, September). Self-efficacy, perceived stress and happiness among students. In 2017 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) (pp. 2105-2109). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCI.2017.8126156
Silva, T.C., & Bardagi, M. P. (2015). O aluno de pós-graduação stricto sensu no Brasil: revisão da literatura dos últimos 20 anos. RBPG. Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação, 12(29), 683-714. https://doi.org/10.21713/2358-2332.2015.v12.853
Sonnentag, S. (2015). Dynamics of well-being. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 2(1), 261-293.
Stillwell, S. B., Vermeesch, A. L., & Scott, J. G. (2017). Interventions to reduce perceived stress among graduate students: A systematic review with implications for evidence‐based practice. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 14(6), 507-513. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12250
Waight, E., & Giordano, A. (2018). Doctoral students’ access to non-academic support for mental health. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 40(4), 390-412. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2018.1478613
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Taís Duarte Silva, Edvalda Araújo Leal, André Faro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The RCO adopts the Free Open Access policy, under the standard Creative Commons agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The agreement provides that:
- Submission of text authorizes its publication and implies commitment that the same material is not being submitted to another journal. The original is considered definitive.
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with necessary recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their personal page) before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
- The journal does not pay copyright to the authors of the published texts.
- The journal's copyright holder, except those already agreed in the Free Open Access Agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), is the Accounting Department of the Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting of Ribeirão Preto of the University of São Paulo.
No submission or publication fees are charged.
Up to 4 authors per article are accepted. Exceptionally duly justified cases may be reviewed by the Executive Committee of the RCO. Exceptional cases are considered as: multi-institutional projects; manuscripts resulting from the collaboration of research groups; or involving large teams for evidence collection, construction of primary data, and comparative experiments.
It is recommended that the authorship be ordered by contribution of each of the individuals listed as authors, especially in the design and planning of the research project, in obtaining or analyzing and interpreting data, and writing. Authors must declare the actual contributions of each author, filling the letter to the editor, at the beginning of the submission, taking responsibility for the information given.
Authors are allowed to change throughout the evaluation process and prior to the publication of the manuscript. The Authors should indicate the composition and final order of authorship in the document signed by all those involved when accepted for publication. If the composition and authoring order is different than previously reported in the system, all previously listed authors should be in agreement.
In the case of identification of authorship without merit or contribution (ghost, guest or gift authorship), the RCO follows the procedure recommended by COPE.
