Liberalização interrompida

Authors

  • Adilson de Oliveira Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Economia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9036.v0i104p51-62

Keywords:

electric system, economic liberalization, wholesale energy market, risk of rationing.

Abstract

The monopoly regime based on service cost tariffs allowed the electrical sector to move up through a virtuous cycle of expansion with decreasing tariffs for decades. That cycle was broken in the last quarter of the past century, when changes in the economic context exerted strong pressures on sector costs. Set in motion during the term of office of President Fernando Henrique Cardoso, liberalization of the electricity market was suspended by the Lula government; and that led to two paradoxes: 1) low technical costs, but with high tariffs; 2) high reserve capacity, but with a permanent risk of energy rationing. Those problems arise from the inconsistencies of the electricity market. Resuming the process of liberalization of the electricity market is a sine qua non condition to move away from the recurring risk of rationing, and to bring the electric system back into operating in a virtuous cycle of expansion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Adilson de Oliveira, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Economia.

    professor do Instituto de Economia da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

References

ARMAND, M.; TARASCON, J. M. “Building Better Batteries”, in Nature, 451, February, 2008, pp. 652-7.

BEESLEY, M. E.; Littlechild, S. C. “The Regulation of Privatized Monopolies in the United Kingdom”, in Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 20, number 3, 1989.

CHRISTENSEN, L. R.; GREENE, W. H. “Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation”, in Journal of Political Economy, Chicago University Press, 1976.

D’ARAUJO, R. P. Setor Elétrico Brasileiro: uma Aventura Mercantil. Rio de Janeiro, Confea-Crea, 2009.

DAVID, P. A.; WRIGHT, G. “General Purpose Technologies and Surges in Productivity: Historical Reflections on the Future of the ICT Revolution”, in Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History, University of Oxford, 1999.

DE OLIVEIRA, A. Electricity System Performance: Options and Opportunities for Developing Countries. Luxemburgo, Coped/CEC, 1992.

DIXIT, A.; PINDYCK, R. Investiment under Uncertainty. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1994.

. “The Political Economy of the Brazilian Power Industry”, in D. Victor; T. Heller. Economy of the Power Sector Reform. Cambridge University Press, 2007.

HART, O. Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. New York, Oxford University Press, 1995.

HUNT, S.; SHUTTLEWORTH, G. Competition and Choice in Electricity. West Sussex, Wiley, 1996.

KAHN, A. The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1988.

LEITE, A. Dias. A Energia do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, Nova Fronteira, 1997.

MEDEIROS, R. O Capital Privado na Reestruturação do Setor Elétrico Brasileiro. Tese de mestrado. Rio de Janeiro, Coppe/UFRJ, 1993.

STOFT, S. Power Sytem Economics. New York, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Wiley and Sons, 2002.

SURREY, J. The British Electricity Experiment. London, Earthcan Publication, 1996.

Published

2015-02-24

Issue

Section

Dossiê Energia Elétrica

How to Cite

OLIVEIRA, Adilson de. Liberalização interrompida. Revista USP, São Paulo, Brasil, n. 104, p. 51–62, 2015. DOI: 10.11606/issn.2316-9036.v0i104p51-62. Disponível em: https://periodicos.usp.br/revusp/article/view/106753.. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2025.