Autorship of a scientific work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v9i3a102374Keywords:
Scientific Work, Research, AuthorshipAbstract
Background. During the development of a scientific research, one of the main difficulties is to choose the authors of the paper from all participants of the investigation. The organization of the authorship, based on the contribution of each investigator is still more complex. Objective: To propose a justified indicator for the authorship of a scientific paper. Method: The author investigated the main research centers of Brazil in order to know their philosophy related to the authorship of a research. An assessment of the literature completed this study. Results: We present and justify the order of each investigator in the authorship or acknowledgment of the paper, based on his or her participation on the investigation Conclusion: The investigator deserves to be included as an author of a scientific paper only if he or she has an intellectual participation in the work and also effectively contributed with the execution and accomplishment of the research. [Rev Assoc Med Bras 2002; 48(1):60-5]
Downloads
References
Petroianu A. Ética moral e deontologia médicas. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2000.
Digiusto E. Equity in authorship. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:55-8.
Drenth JPH. Multiple authorship. JAMA. 1998;280:219-21.
Fllangin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB et al. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peerreviewed medical journals. JAMA. 1998;280:222-4.
Petroianu A. Elaboraçao do trabalho científico. Médico Moderno. 1985;4:63-72.
Petroianu A. Autoria de um trabalho científico. Arq Med Hosp Fac Santa Casa Sao Paulo. 1991;11:83-4.
Petroianu A. A pesquisa em Medicina. Medicina. 1992;25:327-9.
Petroianu A. Consideraçoes sobre a pós-graduaçao stricto sensu em Medicina. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 1995;41:391-6.
Rennie D, Flanagin A, Glass RM. Conflicts of interest in the publication of science. JAMA. 1991;266:266-7.
Rennie D, Yank V, Emanuel L. When authorship fails. JAMA. 1997;278:579-85.
Roland CG. Trends in authorship. Arch Intern Med. 1970;125:771-2.
Wilcox LJ. Authorship. JAMA. 1998;280:216-7.
Petroianu A. Aspectos éticos na pesquisa em animais. Acta Cir Bras. 1996;11:157-164.
Brooten DA. Who's on first. Nursing Res. 1986;35:259.
Hoen WP, Walvoort HC, Overbeke JPM. What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the author's names. JAMA. 1998;280:217-8.
Huth EJ. Guidelines on authorship of medical papers. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:269-74.
Kassirer JP, Angell M. On authorship and acknowledgments. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1510-2.
King CR, McGuire DB, Longman AJ et al. Peer review, authorship, ethics, and conflict of interest. Image. 29;29:163-7.
Petroianu A. Publicaçao do trabalho científico. Ciência e Cultura. 1983;37:410-3.
Lévi-Strauss C. Antropologia estrutural. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro; 1970.
Room R. Envolving standards for authorship. Addiction. 1995;90:1321-2
Fye WB. Medical authorship. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:317-25.
Esser C. Rules needed on authorship. Nature. 1997;389:903.
Wenger NS, Korenman SG, Berk R, et al. The ethics of scientific research. J Invest Med. 1997;45:371-380.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2002 Acta Fisiátrica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
