Planning and co-creation of Quadrilatero Ferrifero cultural landscape

Brazilian Geodesign facing inequalities in access and use of digital information

Authors

  • Ana Clara Mourão Moura Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Christian Rezende Freitas Alo Meio Ambiente e Layer/G21 Geotecnologias
  • Camila Fernandes Morais Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Escola de Arquitetura. Laboratório de Geoprocessamento
  • Ítalo Sousa Sena Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Escola de Arquitetura. Laboratório de Geoprocessamento
  • Pedro Benedito Casagrande Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Departamento de Engenharia de Minas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/gtp.v16i3.176484

Keywords:

Geovisualization, Participatory Planning, GISColab, SDI

Abstract

The article presents results about Geodesign studies of the Iron Quadrangle (Quadrilátero Ferrífero – QF) that are under development since 2016, based on economic, environmental, and social approaches, with the goal to promote cultural landscape planning based on shared process, giving support to collective and individual opinion making. This paper has the goal do present the Brazilian Geodesign platform, called “GISColab”, that was first tested in QF case study. The QF area is characterized by conflicts of interests due to mining activities, urban growth, cultural heritage landscapes and the presence of areas of environmental protection. QF is especially important as part of the economic structure of the state of Minas Gerais (Brazil) but became globally known due to a couple of environmental disasters that caused the death of almost 300 people. In the first studies we used Steinitz´s framework (2012), but some difficulties in the process were observed, what led to the proposal of a new platform and framework, more adapted to inequalities related to access and use of information, so that people could really act as participants of all the steps. The new web-platform is based on Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI), which receives a considerable amount of data and is open to receive further information via Web Map Service (WMS), which guarantees the users will construct, by themselves, judgments about these areas. It presents a shared process of decision making by digital dialogues, as by voting based on Delphi method. The platform and process are based on geovisualization, interoperability and the co-creation of ideas based on geo-collaboration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ana Clara Mourão Moura, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

    Possui graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (1988), Especialização em Planejamento Territorial e Urbano pela PUC-MG e Universidade de Bologna (1990), Mestrado em Geografia (Organização Humana do Espaço) pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (1993) e Doutorado em Geografia (Geoprocessamento) pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (2002). Atualmente é Professor Associado da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Departamento de Urbanismo, e coordena o Laboratório de Geoprocessamento da Escola de Arquitetura. Tem experiência na área de Urbanismo e Geociências, com ênfase em Análise Espacial, Sistemas de Informações Geográficos, Representação Cartográfica, Diagnóstico Ambiental Urbano, Gestão Espacial de Patrimônio Histórico e Paisagístico. Orienta Mestrado e Doutorado no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo (NPGAU-EA-UFMG) e no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geografia (PPGG-IGC-UFMG). Atua principalmente nos seguintes temas: geoprocessamento, cartografia, paisagem, patrimônio cultural, análise ambiental e análise urbana. Coordenadora do grupo de pesquisa CNPq: "Geoprocessamento na Gestão da Paisagem Urbana e Ambiental".

  • Christian Rezende Freitas, Alo Meio Ambiente e Layer/G21 Geotecnologias

    Alo Meio Ambiente e Laboratório de Geoprocessamento, EA-UFMG

  • Camila Fernandes Morais, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Escola de Arquitetura. Laboratório de Geoprocessamento

    Laboratório de Geoprocessamento EA-UFMG

  • Ítalo Sousa Sena, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Escola de Arquitetura. Laboratório de Geoprocessamento

    Laboratório de Geoprocessamento EA-UFMG

References

ABUKHATER, A.; WALKER, D. Making Smart Growth Smarter with Geodesign. In.: ESRI, Changing Geography by design. Redlands, CA, 2010.

ANDRIENKO, G.; ANDRIENKO, N.; KEIM, D.; MacEACHREN, A.; WROBEL, S. Challenging problems of geospatial visual analytics. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing. 22(4), p.251-256, 2011.

BALLAL, H. Collaborative planning with digital design synthesis. Doctoral Dissertation. University College London, 2015.

BALRAM, S.; DRAGICEVIC, S. Collaborative geographic information systems: Origins, boundaries, and structure. Idea Group Publishing, 2006.

BATTY, M. Planning Support Systems: Progress, Predictions, and Speculations on the Shape of Things to Come. UCL, Working Papers Series, 122, p. 1-25, 2007.

BRASIL, Decreto Nº 6.666, de 27 de novembro de 2008. Institui, no âmbito do Poder Executivo federal, a InfraEstrutura Nacional de Dados Espaciais - INDE, e dá outras providências.

BURGERS, G.; KLEIJN, M., MANEN N. Urban Landscape archaeology, geodesign and the city of Rome. In: Lee D., Dias E., Scholten H. (eds) Geodesign by Integrating Design and Geospatial Sciences. GeoJournal Library, 111, 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-08299-8_12

CASAGRANDE, P.; MOURA, A.C.M. The Geological Workshop of Geodesign for Landscape Planning. In Leone, A. & Gargiulo, C. (Eds.), Environmental and territorial modelling for planning and design, p. 595-602, 2018. Naples: FedOAPress. doi: 10.6093/978-88-6887-048-5

CHEN, Y.; DANG, A.; PENG, X. Building a Cultural Heritage Corridor Based on Geodesign Theory and Methodology. Journal of Urban Management, 3(1–2), p. 97-112, 2014. Doi: 10.1016/S2226-5856(18)30086-4.

CRAGLIA M. and CAMPAGNA M. Advanced Regional Spatial Data Infrastructures in Europe. European Commission; Joint Research Centre; Institute for Environment and Sustainability, 2009.

CRUMLEY, C.; KOLEN, J.; KLEIJN, M. & MANEN, N. Studying long-term changes in cultural landscapes: outlines of a research framework and protocol. Landscape Research, 42 (8), 880-890, 2017. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2017.1386292

DALKEY, N.; HELMER, O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), p.351-515, 1963.

EIKELBOOM, T., JANSSEN, R. Collaborative use of geodesign tools to support decision-making on adaptation to climate change. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, V.22, p.247–266, 2017. doi: 10.1007/s11027-015-9633-4

ELMES, G.; DOUGHERTY, M.; CHALLIG, H.; KARIGOMBA, W.; MCCUSKER, B.; WEINER, D.; FISHER, P. Local knowledge doesn’t grow on trees: Community-integrated geographic information systems and rural community self-definition. In.: FISHER, P. F. (Ed.), Advances in spatial data handling. Berlin: Springer Science and Business Media, p. 29-40, 2004.

ELWOOD, S.A. Beyond cooptation or resistance: Urban spatial politics, community organizations, and GIS-based spatial narratives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96 (2): p. 323–341, 2006.

FLAXMAN, M. Fundamentals of Geodesign. In: Buhmann, E., Pietsch, M. & Kretzler, E. (Eds.), Peer Reviewed Proceedings of Digital Landscape Architecture 2010. Berlin/Offenbach, Wichmann, p. 28-41, 2010.

FREITAS, C., MOURA, A.C.M. ETL Tools to Analyze Diagrams’ Performance: Favoring Negotiations in Geodesign Workshops. DisegnareCon, 11(20), p. 1-23, 2018.

GEERTMAN, S, STILLWELL, J. (Eds.), Planning Support Systems Best Practice and New Methods. Springer Netherlands, 2009. 490 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8952-7

HAYEK, U.; WIRTH, T.; NEUENSCHWANDER, N. & GRÊT-REGAMEY, A. Organizing and facilitating Geodesign processes: Integrating tools into collaborative design processes for urban transformation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 156, p. 59-70, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.015

KINGSTON, R. Public Participation in Local Policy Decision-making: The Role of Web-based Mapping. The Cartographic Journal, 44(2), p. 138–144, 2007.

KOLEN J., MANEN N.; KLEIJN M. History Matters: The Temporal and Social Dimension of Geodesign. In: LEE D., DIAS E., SCHOLTEN H. (Eds) Geodesign by Integrating Design and Geospatial Sciences. GeoJournal Library, 111, 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-08299-8_11

MacEACHREN, A.; GAHEGAN, M.; PIKE, W.; BREWER, I.; LENGERICH, E., HARDISTRY, F. Geovisualization for knowledge construction and decision-support. Computer Graphics & Applications. 24(1), p. 13-17, 2004.

MOURA, A.C.M. Geodesign in Parametric Modeling of urban landscape. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 42(4), p. 323-332, 2015.

NYERGES, T. L.; JANKOWSKI, P. Enhanced adaptive structuration theory: A theory of GIS-supported collaborative decision making. Geographical Systems, 4(3), p. 225-257, 1997.

PEUQUET, D., MARBLE, D. Introductory readings in Geographic Information Systems. London, Taylor & Francis, 1990.

RAPINE, A., MELLO-SILVA, R.; KAWASAKI, M.C. Richness and endemism in Asclepiadoideae (Apocynaceae) from the Espinhaço Range of Minas Gerais, Brazil – a conservationist view. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11, p. 1733-1746, 2002.

RIVERO, R.; SMITH, A.; BALLAL, H., STEINITZ, C. Promoting Collaborative Geodesign in a Multidisciplinary and Multiscale Environment: Coastal Georgia 2050, USA. In.: Buhmann, E., Ervin, S. M. & Pietsch, M. (Eds.). Peer Reviewed Proceedings of Digital Landscape Architecture, p. 42-58, 2015.

RUCHKYS, U., MACHADO, M. Patrimônio geológico e mineiro do Quadrilátero Ferrífero, Minas Gerais – caracterização e iniciativas de uso para educação e geoturismo. Boletim Paranaense de Geociências, 70, p. 120-136, 2013.

SIEBER, R. Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, v. 96, n.3, p. 491-507, 2006.

SONTERA, L.; BARRETT, D; SOARES-FILHO, B.; MORAND, C. Global demand for steel drives extensive land-use change in Brazil's Iron Quadrangle. Global Environmental Change, 26, 2014, 63-72, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.014

STEINITZ, C. A Framework for Geodesign: Changing Geography by Design. ESRI Press, Redlands, 2012.

WU, C.; CHIANG, Y. A geodesign framework procedure for developing flood resilient city. Habitat International, 75, p. 78-89, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.04.009.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-23

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 3 (2021): Digital technologies and international cooperations in the management of cultural, architectural and urban heritage

Section

Papers

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Ana Clara Mourão Moura, Christian Rezende Freitas, Italo Sousa Sena, Camila Fernandes Morais, Pedro Benedito Casagrande

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the article simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License BY NC ND, which allows the sharing of article with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of version of the article published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their research work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and the citation of published article (See O Efeito do Acesso Livre).

Funding data

How to Cite

MOURA, Ana Clara Mourão; FREITAS, Christian Rezende; MORAIS, Camila Fernandes; SENA, Ítalo Sousa; CASAGRANDE, Pedro Benedito. Planning and co-creation of Quadrilatero Ferrifero cultural landscape: Brazilian Geodesign facing inequalities in access and use of digital information . Gestão & Tecnologia de Projetos (Design Management and Technology), São Carlos, v. 16, n. 3, 2021. DOI: 10.11606/gtp.v16i3.176484. Disponível em: https://periodicos.usp.br/gestaodeprojetos/article/view/176484.. Acesso em: 2 jun. 2024.