Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Model Disability Survey (MDS) for Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004759Keywords:
Disability Evaluation, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Translations, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Reproducibility of ResultsAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This study has as objective the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Model Disability Survey (MDS), a World Health Organization instrument that provides comprehensive information on disability/functioning, for Brazil. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional methodological study, carried out through five stages – initial translation, synthesis of translations, reverse translation, review by a specialist committee, and pre-test –, considering properties such as semantic, idiomatic, experimental, and conceptual equivalence. Translators, researchers, a mediating team, health professionals, a methodologist and a language specialist were needed to pass through the stages. Statistical analysis was produced from absolute and relative frequencies, measures of central tendency and dispersion, normality tests and content validity index (CVI) > 0.80. RESULTS: The MDS has 474 items, which generated 1,896 analyzes of equivalence. Of these, 160 items had a CVI < 0.80 in at least one of the four types of equivalence and required adjustments. After adaptations and approval by the judges, the pre-final version went on to the pre-test with 30 participants from four regions of the Brazilian Northeast. Regarding this sample, 83.3% are women, single, with an average age of 33.7 years (SD 18.8), self-declared as black or brown, active workers, with technical education and living with three residents. Interviews lasted 123 minutes on average, where 127 health conditions were mentioned, and the most frequent cited were anxiety and back pain. Answers were analyzed and 63 items were cited as needing some adjustment, two of which were submitted for analysis by the committee because they presented a CVI < 0.80. The instrument, guide and presentation cards were adjusted after a new pre-test. CONCLUSIONS: The MDS was translated and cross-culturally adapted to Brazilian Portuguese and showed adequate content validity.
References
World Health Organization. World report on disability. Geneva (CH): WHO; 2011 [citado 6 jun 2022]. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564182
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Diretoria de Pesquisas, Coordenação de Trabalho e Rendimento. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde: 2019: ciclos de vida - Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2021 [citado 6 jun 2022]. 139p. Disponível em: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101846.pdf
Sabariego C. Avaliação da deficiência após a Convenção Internacional dos Direitos das Pessoas com Deficiência: estudo comparativo entre os instrumentos utilizados para a efetivação de direitos previdenciários no Brasil e na Alemanha. Diálogos Setoriais UE-Brasil. 2016 [citado 6 jun 2022]:1-44. Disponível em: http://www.sectordialogues.org/sites/default/files/acoes/documentos/deso0015-publi-pt.pdf
Cappa C, Petrowski N, Njelesani J. Navigating the landscape of child disability measurement: a review of available data collection instruments. Alter. 2015;9(4):317-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ALTER.2015.08.001
Coenen M, Sabariego C, Cieza A. [Recommendation for the collection and analysis of data on participation and disability from the perspective of the World Health Organization]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2016;59(9):1060-7. German. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00103-016-2412-X
Castro SS, Castaneda L, Araújo ES, Buchalla CM. Aferição de funcionalidade em inquéritos de saúde no Brasil: discussão sobre instrumentos baseados na Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde (CIF). Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2016;19(3):679-87. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5497201600030018
Castro SS, Leite CF, Baldin JE, Accioly MF. Validation of the Brazilian version of WHODAS 2.0 in patients on hemodialysis therapy. Fisioter Mov. 2018;31:e00313. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.031.AO30
Franzoi AC, Xerez DR, Blanco M, Amaral T, Costa AJ, Khan P, et al. Etapas da elaboração do instrumento de classificação do grau de funcionalidade de pessoas com deficiência para cidadãos brasileiros: Índice de Funcionalidade Brasileiro - IF-Br. Acta Fisiatr. 2013 [citado 6 jun 2022];20(3):164-70. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5935/0104-7795.20130028
Coelho JN. Validação do Índice de Funcionalidade Brasileiro e descrição do perfil funcional de indivíduos com doença neurovascular, amputações, lesão medular e lombalgia [tese]. Ribeirão Preto: Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo; 2020. 163p.
Pereira EL, Barbosa L. Índice de Funcionalidade Brasileiro: percepções de profissionais e pessoas com deficiência no contexto da LC 142/2013. Cienc Saude Colet. 2016;21(10):3017-26. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320152110.18352016
Barros APN. Dependência e deficiência: um estudo sobre o Índice de Funcionalidade Brasileiro aplicado à aposentadoria (IFBr-A) [dissertação]. Brasília, DF: Departamento de Serviço Social, Universidade de Brasília; 2016. 85 p.
Stucki G, Bickenbach J. Functioning: the third health indicator in the health system and the key indicator for rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(1):134-8. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04565-8
Sabariego C, Fellinghauer C, Lee L, Kamenov K, Posarac A, Bickenbach J, et al. Generating comprehensive functioning and disability data worldwide: development process, data analyses strategy and reliability of the WHO and World Bank Model Disability Survey. Arch Public Health. 2022;80(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00769-z
Loidl V, Oberhauser C, Ballert C, Coenen M, Cieza A, Sabariego C. Which environmental factors have the highest impact on the performance of people experiencing difficulties in capacity? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(4):416. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH13040416
Sabariego C, Oberhauser C, Posarac A, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, et al. Measuring disability: comparing the impact of two data collection approaches on disability rates. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(9):10329-51. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH120910329
Sabariego C, Fellinghauer C, Lee L, Posarac A, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, et al. Measuring functioning and disability using household surveys: metric properties of the brief version of the WHO and World Bank model disability survey. Arch Public Health. 2021;79(1):128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00654-9
World Health Organization. ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva (CH): WHO; 2001 [citado 6 jun 2022]. Disponível em: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42407/9241545429.pdf?sequence=1
Masala C, Petretto DR. From disablement to enablement: conceptual models of disability in the 20th century. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(17):1233-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701602418
Ministério de Desarrollo Social (CL); Servicio Nacional de la Discapacidad. II Estudio Nacional de la Discapacidad 2015. Santiago de Chile; 2016 [citado 6 jun 2022]. Disponível em: https://www.senadis.gob.cl/descarga/i/3959
World Health Organization. Model Disability Survey (MDS): survey manual. Geneva (CH): WHO; 2017 [citado 6 jun 2022]. Disponível em: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/258513/9789241512862-eng.pdf?sequence=1
Fortes CPDD, Araújo APQC. Checklist para tradução e adaptação transcultural de questionários em saúde. Cad Saude Colet. 2019;27(2):202-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-462X201900020002
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. COSMIN checklist manual. Amsterdam (NL); 2012 [citado 6 jun 2022]. 56 p. Disponível em: https://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/sites/default Patrick /files/cosmin_checklist_manual_v9.pdf
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186-91. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
Jasper MA. Expert: a discussion of the implications of the concept as used in nursing. J Adv Nurs. 1994;20:769-76. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2648.1994.20040769.X
Alexandre NMC, Coluci MZO. Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas. Cienc Saude Colet. 2011;16(7):3061-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000800006
Almanasreh E, Moles R, Chen TF. Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2019;15(2):214-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SAPHARM.2018.03.066
Tucki G, Bickenbach J. Functioning: the third health indicator in the health system and the key indicator for rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(1):134-8. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04565-8
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Érika Giovana Carvalho da Silva, Shamyr Sulyvan Castro, Carla Sabariego, Karolinne Souza Monteiro, Núbia Maria Freire Vieira Lima
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Funding data
-
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Grant numbers Código 001 -
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte